Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jul 28:13:882346.
doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.882346. eCollection 2022.

The dynamic transcriptome during maturation of biofilms formed by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

Affiliations

The dynamic transcriptome during maturation of biofilms formed by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

Jelle Vlaeminck et al. Front Microbiol. .

Abstract

Background: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), a leading cause of chronic infections, forms prolific biofilms which afford an escape route from antibiotic treatment and host immunity. However, MRSA clones are genetically diverse, and mechanisms underlying biofilm formation remain under-studied. Such studies form the basis for developing targeted therapeutics. Here, we studied the temporal changes in the biofilm transcriptome of three pandemic MRSA clones: USA300, HEMRSA-15, and ST239.

Methods: Biofilm formation was assessed using a static model with one representative strain per clone. Total RNA was extracted from biofilm and planktonic cultures after 24, 48, and 72 h of growth, followed by rRNA depletion and sequencing (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, United States, NextSeq500, v2, 1 × 75 bp). Differentially expressed gene (DEG) analysis between phenotypes and among early (24 h), intermediate (48 h), and late (72 h) stages of biofilms was performed together with in silico co-expression network construction and compared between clones. To understand the influence of SCCmec and ACME on biofilm formation, isogenic mutants containing deletions of the entire elements or of single genes therein were constructed in USA300.

Results: Genes involved in primarily core genome-encoded KEGG pathways (transporters and others) were upregulated in 24-h biofilm culture compared to 24-h planktonic culture. However, the number of affected pathways in the ST239 24 h biofilm (n = 11) was remarkably lower than that in USA300/EMRSA-15 biofilms (USA300: n = 27, HEMRSA-15: n = 58). The clfA gene, which encodes clumping factor A, was the single common DEG identified across the three clones in 24-h biofilm culture (2.2- to 2.66-fold). In intermediate (48 h) and late (72 h) stages of biofilms, decreased expression of central metabolic and fermentative pathways (glycolysis/gluconeogenesis, fatty acid biosynthesis), indicating a shift to anaerobic conditions, was already evident in USA300 and HEMRSA-15 in 48-h biofilm cultures; ST239 showed a similar profile at 72 h. Last, SCCmec+ACME deletion and opp3D disruption negatively affected USA300 biofilm formation.

Conclusion: Our data show striking differences in gene expression during biofilm formation by three of the most important pandemic MRSA clones, USA300, HEMRSA-15, and ST239. The clfA gene was the only significantly upregulated gene across all three strains in 24-h biofilm cultures and exemplifies an important target to disrupt early biofilms. Furthermore, our data indicate a critical role for arginine catabolism pathways in early biofilm formation.

Keywords: MRSA; Staphylococcus aureus; biofilm; clumping factor A; transcriptome.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Gene expression analysis of 24-h biofilm and planktonic phenotypes in three representative MRSA strains: HEMRSA-15 (left), ST239-16 (middle), and UAS391 (right). (A) Principal component analysis shows global differences between biofilm (red) and planktonic (blue) phenotypes of all three strains. (B) Metabolic pathway signatures of biofilm compared to planktonic bacteria after 24 h of growth. Identified DEGs were mapped against the KEGG database to obtain KO terms and associated metabolic pathways. Color-coded cells represent the number of enriched genes [log10(1 + number of enriched genes)] in the respective KEGG pathway in accordance with the color scale. Black–gray marking indicates whether some enriched genes in the KEGG pathway are linked to the accessory genome (consisting of genes that are not present in all the three genomes, black) or in the core genome (gray). Two biological repeats were used for each phenotype in each strain across time points.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Gene expression analysis of 48-h biofilm and planktonic phenotypes in three representative MRSA strains: HEMRSA-15 (left), ST239-16 (middle), and UAS391 (right). Metabolic pathway signatures of biofilms compared to planktonic bacteria after 48 h of growth. Identified DEGs were mapped against the KEGG database to obtain KO terms and associated metabolic pathways. Color-coded cells represent the number of enriched genes [log10(1 + number of enriched genes)] in the respective KEGG pathway in accordance with the color scale. Black–gray marking indicates whether some enriched genes in the KEGG pathway are linked to the accessory genome (black) or not (gray). Two biological repeats were used for each phenotype in each strain across time points.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Archer N. K., Mazaitis M. J., Costerton J. W., Leid J. G., Powers M. E., Shirtliff M. E. (2011). Staphylococcus aureus biofilms: properties, regulation, and roles in human disease. Virulence 2 445–459. 10.4161/viru.2.5.17724 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Atshan S. S., Shamsudin M. N., Karunanidhi A., van Belkum A., Lung L. T. T., Sekawi Z., et al. (2013). Quantitative PCR analysis of genes expressed during biofilm development of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Infect. Genet. Evol. J. Mol. Epidemiol. Evol. Genet. Infect. Dis. 18 106–112. 10.1016/j.meegid.2013.05.002 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bankevich A., Nurk S., Antipov D., Gurevich A. A., Dvorkin M., Kulikov A. S., et al. (2012). SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J. Comput. Biol. 19 455–477. 10.1089/cmb.2012.0021 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bastian M., Heymann S., Jacomy M. (2009). Gephi: an open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. Proc. Int. AAAI Conf. Web Soc. Media 3 361–362.
    1. Beenken K. E., Dunman P. M., McAleese F., Macapagal D., Murphy E., Projan S. J., et al. (2004). Global gene expression in Staphylococcus aureus biofilms. J. Bacteriol. 186 4665–4684. 10.1128/JB.186.14.4665-4684.2004 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources