Comparison of Placenta Previa and Placenta Accreta Spectrum Disorder Following Previous Cesarean Section between Women with a Short and Normal Interpregnancy Interval
- PMID: 35967192
- PMCID: PMC9365601
- DOI: 10.1155/2022/8028639
Comparison of Placenta Previa and Placenta Accreta Spectrum Disorder Following Previous Cesarean Section between Women with a Short and Normal Interpregnancy Interval
Abstract
Objectives: The aim of this study is to determine the effect of interpregnancy interval (IPI) on the incidence of placenta previa and placenta accreta spectrum disorders in women with a previous cesarean section.
Methods: A prospective cohort three-center study involving parturients who had previous cesarean section was conducted. Participants were included if pregnancy has lasted up to 34 weeks. Parturients with co-existing uterine fibroids, multiple gestations, premature rupture of membranes, and those with prior postcesarean delivery wound infection were excluded. The eligible women recruited were distributed into two groups, namely, short (<18 months) and normal (18-36 months) IPI. The outcome measures were incidences of placenta previa and placenta accreta spectrum disorder and factors associated with the occurrence of placenta previa. A univariate analysis was performed using the chi-square test or Mann-Whitney U test, wherever appropriate, to examine the significance of the differences in clinical variables.
Results: A total of 248 women met the inclusion criteria. The incidence of placenta previa by ultrasound was 8.9% and 4.0% for short and normal IPI (odds ratios = 2.32; 95% confidence intervals = 0.78-6.88; p = 0.13), respectively. The incidence of placenta accreta spectrum disorder was 1.6% and 0.8% for short and normal IPI (odds ratios = 2.02; 95% confidence intervals = 0.18-22.13; p = 0.57), respectively. The only observed significant difference between the clinical variables and placenta previa is the number of cesarean sections (p = 0.02) in women with short IPI.
Conclusion: A short interpregnancy interval does not significantly affect the incidence of placenta previa and placenta accreta spectrum disorder following a cesarean section. There is a need for further study with large numbers to corroborate these findings in low- and middle-income settings.
Copyright © 2022 Uchenna Anthony Umeh et al.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Association between short interpregnancy interval and placenta accreta spectrum.AJOG Glob Rep. 2022 Feb 19;2(2):100051. doi: 10.1016/j.xagr.2022.100051. eCollection 2022 May. AJOG Glob Rep. 2022. PMID: 36275493 Free PMC article.
-
In vitro fertilization as an independent risk factor for placenta accreta spectrum.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Oct;223(4):568.e1-568.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.04.026. Epub 2020 Apr 30. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020. PMID: 32360847
-
[Placenta previa accreta].Ginekol Pol. 2004 Dec;75(12):919-25. Ginekol Pol. 2004. PMID: 15751211 Polish.
-
Placenta previa, placenta accreta, and vasa previa.Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Apr;107(4):927-41. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000207559.15715.98. Obstet Gynecol. 2006. PMID: 16582134 Review.
-
First trimester serum PAPP-A is associated with placenta accreta: a retrospective study.Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2021 Mar;303(3):645-652. doi: 10.1007/s00404-020-05960-1. Epub 2021 Jan 30. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2021. PMID: 33515274 Review.
Cited by
-
High-risk pregnancy in India: Prevalence and contributing risk factors - a national survey-based analysis.J Glob Health. 2023 Sep 15;13:04116. doi: 10.7189/jogh.13.04116. J Glob Health. 2023. PMID: 37712385 Free PMC article.
References
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous