Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Aug 6:13:21514593221116413.
doi: 10.1177/21514593221116413. eCollection 2022.

A Novel Osteoporosis Screening Protocol to Identify Orthopedic Surgery Patients for Preoperative Bone Health Optimization

Affiliations

A Novel Osteoporosis Screening Protocol to Identify Orthopedic Surgery Patients for Preoperative Bone Health Optimization

Elliot Chang et al. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. .

Abstract

Introduction: Osteoporosis is highly prevalent in elective orthopedic surgery. While preoperative bone health optimization decreases osteoporosis-related complications, there is an unmet need to establish who may benefit from preoperative dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). This study assesses a novel, simple screening protocol to identify orthopedic surgical patients for preoperative DXA.

Materials/methods: This retrospective cohort study included 628 patients undergoing total knee, hip, or shoulder arthroplasty or thoracolumbar spine fusion. Inclusion criteria were ≥40 years undergoing primary elective surgery. Screening criteria defining who should obtain DXA due to high osteoporosis risk included: female ≥65, male ≥70, fracture history when ≥50 years, or FRAX major osteoporotic fracture risk (without bone mineral density [BMD]-adjustments) ≥8.4%. Osteoporosis was defined by World Health Organization criteria [T-score ≤ -2.5], clinical National Osteoporosis Foundation (NOF) criteria [T-score ≤ -2.5, elevated BMD-adjusted FRAX risk, or prior hip/spine fracture], and modified clinical criteria [NOF criteria simplified to include any non-traumatic prior fracture and FRAX without BMD].

Results: The study included 100 TKAs, 100 THAs, 251 TSAs, and 177 spine fusions, average age 65.6 ± 9.8. DXA was available for 209 patients. Screening criteria recommending DXA was met by 362 patients. For those with DXA, screening sensitivity was .96 (CI: .78 to .99) and specificity was .19 (CI: .14 to .25) for identifying T-score osteoporosis. Similar sensitivity of .99 (CI: .91 to .99) and specificity of .61 (CI: .56 to .66) were found for modified clinical osteoporosis. For modified clinical osteoporosis, 192 patients with osteoporosis met criteria (true pos.), 1 patient with osteoporosis did not meet criteria (false neg.), 170 patients without osteoporosis met criteria (false pos.), and 265 patients without osteoporosis did not meet criteria (true neg.).

Discussion/conclusion: A simple screening protocol identifies orthopedic surgical candidates at risk of T-score or clinical osteoporosis for preoperative DXA with high sensitivity.

Keywords: adult reconstructive surgery; bone health optimization; bone health screening; bone mineral density; fragility fractures; metabolic bone disorders; osteoporosis; spine surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
This algorithm outlines the proposed preoperative bone health optimization initiative, including criteria for DXA testing and how to apply results in surgical planning.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
This algorithm illustrates how the 628 subjects were categorized based on screening indication and modified clinical osteoporosis criteria. In addition to age and fracture history, the FRAX risk factors listed were used to calculate 10-year fracture risk for screening determination.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Screening protocol sensitivity and specificity when evaluating for World Health Organization T-score (n = 209), National Osteoporosis Foundation clinical osteoporosis (n = 628), and modified clinical osteoporosis criteria (n = 628). (*Error lines represent 95% confidence intervals as calculated by Clopper-Pearson criteria.)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Anderson PA, Jeray KJ, Lane JM, Binkley NC. Bone health optimization: Beyond own the bone: AOA critical issues. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - American. 2019;101:1413-1419. doi:10.2106/JBJS.18.01229 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Maier GS, Kolbow K, Lazovic D, Maus U. The importance of bone mineral density in hip arthroplasty: Results of a survey asking orthopaedic surgeons about their opinions and attitudes concerning osteoporosis and hip arthroplasty. Advances in Orthopedics. 2016;2016:1-5. doi:10.1155/2016/8079354 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Edwards PK, Mears SC, Stambough JB, Foster SE, Barnes CL. Choices, compromises, and controversies in total knee and total hip arthroplasty modifiable risk factors: What you need to know. J Arthroplasty. 2018;33:3101-3106. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2018.02.066 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bernatz JT, Brooks AE, Squire MW, et al. Osteoporosis is common and undertreated prior to total joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2019;34:1347-1353. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2019.03.044 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yagi M, King AB, Boachie-Adjei O. Characterization of osteopenia/osteoporosisin adult scoliosis: Does bone density affect surgical outcome? Spine. 2011;36:1652-1657. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e31820110b4 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources