Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jul;10(4):734-751.
doi: 10.1177/21677026211056596. Epub 2021 Dec 21.

The prognostic utility of personality traits versus past psychiatric diagnoses: Predicting future mental health and functioning

Affiliations

The prognostic utility of personality traits versus past psychiatric diagnoses: Predicting future mental health and functioning

Monika A Waszczuk et al. Clin Psychol Sci. 2022 Jul.

Abstract

Past psychiatric diagnoses are central to patient case formulation and prognosis. Recently, alternative classification models such as the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP) proposed to assess traits to predict clinically-relevant outcomes. The current study directly compared personality traits and past diagnoses as predictors of future mental health and functioning in three independent, prospective samples. Regression analyses found that personality traits significantly predicted future first onsets of psychiatric disorders (ΔR2=06-.15), symptom chronicity (ΔR2=.03-.06), and functioning (ΔR2=.02-.07), beyond past and current psychiatric diagnoses. Conversely, past psychiatric diagnoses did not provide an incremental prediction of outcomes when personality traits and other concurrent predictors were already included in the model. Overall, personality traits predicted a variety of outcomes in diverse settings, beyond diagnoses. Past diagnoses were generally not informative about future outcomes when personality was considered. Together, these findings support the added value of personality traits assessment in case formulation, consistent with HiTOP model.

Keywords: Diagnosis; Functioning; Personality traits; Psychopathology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1 –
Figure 1 –. Incremental predictions of mental health outcomes by personality traits and past diagnoses.
Notes: Asterisk denotes significant ΔR2 at p<.05 when the predictor was added to the model in the final regression block, after accounting for all other predictors. In the community adolescents sample, the effect size for analyses of first onsets is reported as Nagelkerke pseudo R2.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Andrews G, Anstey K, Brodaty H, Issakidis C, & Luscombe G (1999). Recall of depressive episode 25 years previously. Psychological medicine, 29(4), 787–791. - PubMed
    1. Bach B, Markon K, Simonsen E, & Krueger RF (2015). Clinical utility of the DSM-5 alternative model of personality disorders: Six cases from practice. Journal of Psychiatric Practice®, 21(1), 3–25. - PubMed
    1. Blanchard EB, Jones-Alexander J, Buckley TC, & Forneris CA (1996). Psychometric properties of the PTSD Checklist (PCL). Behaviour research and therapy, 34(8), 669–673. - PubMed
    1. Braveman P, Egerter S, & Williams DR (2011). The social determinants of health: coming of age. Annual review of public health, 32. - PubMed
    1. Bromet E, Dunn LO, Connell MM, Dew MA, & Schulberg HC (1986). Long-term reliability of diagnosing lifetime major depression in a community sample. Archives of General Psychiatry, 43(5), 435–440. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources