<Editors' Choice> Elective nodal irradiation versus involved field radiotherapy for limited disease small cell lung cancer: a single-institution experience
- PMID: 35967948
- PMCID: PMC9350561
- DOI: 10.18999/nagjms.84.2.327
<Editors' Choice> Elective nodal irradiation versus involved field radiotherapy for limited disease small cell lung cancer: a single-institution experience
Abstract
Elective nodal irradiation (ENI) and involved field radiotherapy (IFRT) are definitive radiotherapeutic approaches used to treat patients with limited-disease small cell lung cancer (LD-SCLC). However, no solid consensus exists on their optimal target volume. The current study aimed to assess the clinical outcomes of patients with LD-SCLC who received definitive ENI or IFRT. A retrospective single-institution study of patients who received definitive radiotherapy between 2008 and 2020 was performed. All patients underwent whole-body positron emission tomography/computed tomography before three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy. Among the 37 patients analyzed, 22 and 15 received ENI and IFRT, respectively. The thoracic radiotherapy dose was mostly either 60 Gy in 30 fractions delivered in 2-Gy fractions once daily or 45 Gy in 30 fractions delivered in 1.5-Gy fractions twice daily. The median follow-up period was 21.4 months. A total of 12 patients (32%) experienced locoregional relapse: 10 within and 2 outside the irradiation fields. One patient in the IFRT group experienced isolated nodal failure. Differences in locoregional relapse-free, progression-free, and overall survival rates between ENI and IFRT were not significant. Overall, IFRT did not promote a significant increase in locoregional recurrence compared to ENI. Our findings suggested the utility of IFRT in standard clinical practice and support its use for patients with LD-SCLC.
Keywords: chemoradiotherapy; elective nodal irradiation; involved field radiotherapy; limited disease; small cell lung cancer.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest regarding this study.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Elective nodal irradiation (ENI) vs. involved field radiotherapy (IFRT) for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): A comparative analysis of toxicities and clinical outcomes.Radiother Oncol. 2010 May;95(2):178-84. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2010.02.007. Epub 2010 Mar 29. Radiother Oncol. 2010. PMID: 20356642
-
Involved-field radiotherapy (IFRT) versus elective nodal irradiation (ENI) in combination with concurrent chemotherapy for 239 esophageal cancers: a single institutional retrospective study.Radiat Oncol. 2015 Aug 14;10:171. doi: 10.1186/s13014-015-0482-9. Radiat Oncol. 2015. PMID: 26269033 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of Involved Field Radiotherapy versus Elective Nodal Irradiation in Stage IIIB/C Non-Small-Cell Lung Carcinoma Patients Treated with Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy: A Propensity Score Matching Study.J Oncol. 2020 Sep 4;2020:7083149. doi: 10.1155/2020/7083149. eCollection 2020. J Oncol. 2020. PMID: 32952557 Free PMC article.
-
Involved field radiotherapy (IFRT) versus elective nodal irradiation (ENI) for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis of incidence of elective nodal failure (ENF).Radiat Oncol. 2016 Sep 21;11(1):124. doi: 10.1186/s13014-016-0698-3. Radiat Oncol. 2016. PMID: 27655339 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The role of involved field irradiation versus elective nodal irradiation in definitive radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer- a systematic review and meta-analysis.Front Oncol. 2022 Nov 2;12:1034656. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1034656. eCollection 2022. Front Oncol. 2022. PMID: 36408184 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Effect of FDG PET-CT for Staging and Radiotherapy Planning - A Comparison of Cohorts From Two Randomized Trials of Thoracic Radiotherapy in Limited-Stage SCLC.JTO Clin Res Rep. 2024 May 16;5(9):100688. doi: 10.1016/j.jtocrr.2024.100688. eCollection 2024 Sep. JTO Clin Res Rep. 2024. PMID: 39286339 Free PMC article.
References
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials