Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Jul 28:13:972143.
doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.972143. eCollection 2022.

Update in autoimmune and paraneoplastic myelopathies: Newly described antigen targets and antibody testing

Affiliations
Review

Update in autoimmune and paraneoplastic myelopathies: Newly described antigen targets and antibody testing

Michlene Passeri et al. Front Neurol. .

Abstract

Myelopathy is an increasingly recognized presentation of many antibody-mediated neuroinflammatory disorders. While specific features of certain autoimmune myelopathies such as aquaporin-4 antibody associated neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein associated disorder (MOGAD) are well-characterized, other less commonly seen antibody-associated myelopathies are not as well-defined. These include but are not limited to, Hu/ANNA1, anti-glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), anti-CV2/collapsin response mediator protein (CRMP5), and amphiphysin. Here, we review the mentioned more common antibody mediated myelopathies as well those that as less common, followed by a review of differentials that may mimic these disorders.

Keywords: MOG antibody associated diseases; NMO spectrum disorder (NMOSD); autoimmune manifestations; myelitis; myelopathy; paraneoplastic syndrome (PNS).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Author AP reports grants from University of Colorado and Rocky Mountain MS Center, consulting fees from Genentech/Roche and Alexion, and also receive honorarium from Medlink and publication royalties from Springer as co-editor of a textbook. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
All images collected from cases seen at the Autoimmune and Neuroimmunology clinics at the University of Colorado. (a–d) AQP4-IgG positive 52-year-old woman with progressive limb weakness and sensory loss with MRI showing (a) sagittal confluent T2 hyperintensity with cord edema from C2 to T1, (b) axial central predominant T2 hyperintense lesion, (c) sagittal ring-enhancement pattern from C3 to C5, and (d) Axial ring enhancement pattern with central and lateral involvement. (e–h) MOG IgG positive 12-year-old-girl with gait abnormality and mild lower extremity weakness with MRI showing (e) sagittal T2 hyperintensity with mild cord edema from C4 to C7, (f) axial gray matter T2 hyperintensity with appearance of an “H” sign, (g) sagittal T2 hyperintensity of the conus medullaris, and (h) Axial subtle symmetric central T2 hyperintensity. (i–n) CRMP5 IgG positive 54-year-old woman with paraplegia, found to have a neuroendocrine carcinoma suggestive of thymus or small cell lung origin and MRI with (i) sagittal T2 hyperintensity with cord swelling from C2 to T1, (j) axial posterior and lateral T2 hyperintensity, (k) sagittal dorsal subpial contrast enhancement from C2 through T1, (l) axial anterior, lateral, and dorsal subpial contrast enhancement, (m) sagittal T2 hyperintensity from T1 to T11, and (n) axial central predominant T2 hyperintensity. (o–t) GFAP IgG positive 63 year old woman with subacute progressive encephalomyelitis with no underlying malignancy and MRI findings of (o) sagittal patchy, extensive ventral T2 hyperintense lesions from the craniocervical junction to C7, (p) Axial ventral T2 hyperintensity, (q) sagittal dorsal and central enhancement at the margin of the craniocervical junction as well as ventral enhancement at the margin of the cord at C3 and C6, (r) axial dorsal and ventral subpial enhancement, (s) sagittal diffuse enhancement of the ventral and dorsal margins of the distal thoracic cord from T8 to T11, and (t) axial ventral subpial enhancement.

References

    1. Flanagan EP. Autoimmune myelopathies. Handb Clin Neurol. (2016) 133:327–51. 10.1016/B978-0-444-63432-0.00019-0 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Autoimmune Myelopathy Evaluation Mayo Clinic Laboratories (2022). Available from: https://www.mayocliniclabs.com/api/sitecore/TestCatalog/DownloadTestCata... (accessed June 17, 2022).
    1. Flanagan EP. Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder and other non-multiple sclerosis central nervous system inflammatory diseases. Continuum. (2019) 25:815–44. 10.1212/CON.0000000000000742 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wingerchuk DM, Banwell B, Bennett JL, Cabre P, Carroll W, Chitnis T, et al. . International consensus diagnostic criteria for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders. Neurology. (2015) 85:177–89. 10.1212/WNL.0000000000001729 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Waters PJ, McKeon A, Leite MI, Rajasekharan S, Lennon VA, Villalobos A, et al. . Serologic diagnosis of NMO: a multicenter comparison of aquaporin-4-IgG assays. Neurology. (2012) 78:665–71; discussion 9. 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318248dec1 - DOI - PMC - PubMed