Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jul 28:10:922708.
doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.922708. eCollection 2022.

Potential Barriers of Patient Involvement in Health Technology Assessment in Central and Eastern European Countries

Affiliations

Potential Barriers of Patient Involvement in Health Technology Assessment in Central and Eastern European Countries

Maria Dimitrova et al. Front Public Health. .

Abstract

Patients' perspectives are important to identify preferences, estimate values and appreciate unmet medical needs in the process of research and development and subsequent assessment of new health technologies. Patient and public involvement in health technology assessment (HTA) is essential in understanding and assessing wider implications of coverage and reimbursement decisions for patients, their relatives, caregivers, and the general population. There are two approaches to incorporating the patients' voice in HTA, preferably used in a mix. In the first one, patients, caregivers and/or their representatives directly participate at discussions in different stages of the HTA process, often at the same table with other stakeholders. Secondly, patient involvement activities can be supported by evidence on patient value and experience collected directly from patients, caregivers and/or their representatives often by patient groups Patient involvement practices, however, are limited in Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries without clear methodology or regulatory mechanisms to guide patient involvement in the HTA process. This poses the question of transferability of practices used in other countries, and might call for the development of new CEE-specific guidelines and methods. In this study we aim to map potential barriers of patient involvement in HTA in countries of the CEE region.

Keywords: barrier; central and eastern EU countries; health technology assessment (HTA); patient engagement; potential.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Authors IJ, AZ, BN, and ZK are employed by Syreon Research Institute. At the time of the study IJ was the President of the European Patients' Forum Youth Group and a Board of Trustees member at the EUPATI Foundation. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow-diagram of articles screened in the scoping literature review.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hunter A, Facey K, Thomas V, Haerry D, Warner K, Klingmann I, et al. . EUPATI guidance for patient involvement in medicines research and development: health technology assessment. Front Med. (2018) 5:231. 10.3389/fmed.2018.00231 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. O'Rourke B, Oortwijn W, Schuller T, International Joint Task Group . The new definition of health technology assessment: a milestone in international collaboration. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. (2020) 36:187–90. 10.1017/S0266462320000215 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Single AN, Facey KM, Livingstone H, Silva AS. Stories of patient involvement impact in health technology assessments: a discussion paper. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. (2019) 35:266–72. 10.1017/S0266462319000552 - DOI - PubMed
    1. SEED Project (Shaping European Early Dialogues: The Seed Project). Available online at: https://www.eunethta.eu/seed/ (accessed March 16, 2022).
    1. Gagnon MP, Tantchou Dipankui M, Poder TG, Payne-Gagnon J, Mbemba G, Beretta V. Patient and public involvement in health technology assessment: update of a systematic review of international experiences. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. (2021) 37:e36:1–16. 10.1017/S0266462321000064 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types