Potential Barriers of Patient Involvement in Health Technology Assessment in Central and Eastern European Countries
- PMID: 35968493
- PMCID: PMC9371596
- DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.922708
Potential Barriers of Patient Involvement in Health Technology Assessment in Central and Eastern European Countries
Abstract
Patients' perspectives are important to identify preferences, estimate values and appreciate unmet medical needs in the process of research and development and subsequent assessment of new health technologies. Patient and public involvement in health technology assessment (HTA) is essential in understanding and assessing wider implications of coverage and reimbursement decisions for patients, their relatives, caregivers, and the general population. There are two approaches to incorporating the patients' voice in HTA, preferably used in a mix. In the first one, patients, caregivers and/or their representatives directly participate at discussions in different stages of the HTA process, often at the same table with other stakeholders. Secondly, patient involvement activities can be supported by evidence on patient value and experience collected directly from patients, caregivers and/or their representatives often by patient groups Patient involvement practices, however, are limited in Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries without clear methodology or regulatory mechanisms to guide patient involvement in the HTA process. This poses the question of transferability of practices used in other countries, and might call for the development of new CEE-specific guidelines and methods. In this study we aim to map potential barriers of patient involvement in HTA in countries of the CEE region.
Keywords: barrier; central and eastern EU countries; health technology assessment (HTA); patient engagement; potential.
Copyright © 2022 Dimitrova, Jakab, Mitkova, Kamusheva, Tachkov, Nemeth, Zemplenyi, Dawoud, Delnoij, Houýez and Kalo.
Conflict of interest statement
Authors IJ, AZ, BN, and ZK are employed by Syreon Research Institute. At the time of the study IJ was the President of the European Patients' Forum Youth Group and a Board of Trustees member at the EUPATI Foundation. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Recommendations for patient involvement in health technology assessment in Central and Eastern European countries.Front Public Health. 2023 Jul 3;11:1176200. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1176200. eCollection 2023. Front Public Health. 2023. PMID: 37465169 Free PMC article.
-
Quo Vadis HTA for Medical Devices in Central and Eastern Europe? Recommendations to Address Methodological Challenges.Front Public Health. 2021 Jan 8;8:612410. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.612410. eCollection 2020. Front Public Health. 2021. PMID: 33490024 Free PMC article.
-
Recommendations to overcome barriers to the use of artificial intelligence-driven evidence in health technology assessment.Front Public Health. 2023 Apr 26;11:1088121. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1088121. eCollection 2023. Front Public Health. 2023. PMID: 37181704 Free PMC article.
-
Value and Implementation of Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement in Health Technology Assessment for Japan: implications from systematic searches.Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2025 Feb 28;41(1):e14. doi: 10.1017/S026646232500008X. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2025. PMID: 40017112 Free PMC article.
-
Health technology assessment of medical devices: What is different? An overview of three European projects.Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2015;109(4-5):309-18. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2015.06.011. Epub 2015 Jul 26. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2015. PMID: 26354131 Review.
Cited by
-
Navigating the path towards successful implementation of the EU HTA Regulation: key takeaways from the 2023 Spring Convention of the European Access Academy.Health Res Policy Syst. 2024 Jul 2;22(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01154-2. Health Res Policy Syst. 2024. PMID: 38956568 Free PMC article.
-
Hospital-based health technology assessment of innovative medical devices: insights from a nationwide survey in France.Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2023 Sep 21;39(1):e58. doi: 10.1017/S0266462323000521. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2023. PMID: 37732461 Free PMC article.
-
Integrating Patient Perspectives Into the Digital Health Technology Readiness Framework: Delphi Study.J Med Internet Res. 2025 Aug 20;27:e71600. doi: 10.2196/71600. J Med Internet Res. 2025. PMID: 40835414 Free PMC article.
-
Perception of non-layperson advisory committee members on the application of a discrete choice experiment instrument to patients and advisory committee members: a qualitative study.Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2025 Feb 25;41(1):e31. doi: 10.1017/S0266462325000029. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2025. PMID: 39995096 Free PMC article.
-
Patient and public involvement in the benefit-risk assessment and decision concerning health products: position of the Scientific Advisory Board of the French National Agency for Medicines and Health Products Safety (ANSM).BMJ Glob Health. 2023 May;8(5):e011966. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-011966. BMJ Glob Health. 2023. PMID: 37208125 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- SEED Project (Shaping European Early Dialogues: The Seed Project). Available online at: https://www.eunethta.eu/seed/ (accessed March 16, 2022).
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous