Digital Global Recruitment for Women's Health Research: Cross-sectional Study
- PMID: 35969168
- PMCID: PMC9520381
- DOI: 10.2196/39046
Digital Global Recruitment for Women's Health Research: Cross-sectional Study
Abstract
Background: With the increased popularity of mobile menstrual tracking apps and boosted Facebook posts, there is a unique opportunity to recruit research study participants from across the globe via these modalities to evaluate women's health. However, no studies to date have assessed the feasibility of using these recruitment sources for epidemiological research on ovulation and menstruation.
Objective: The objective of this study was to assess the feasibility of recruiting a diverse sample of women to an epidemiological study of ovulation and menstruation (OM) health (OM Global Health Study) using digital recruitment sources. The feasibility and diversity were assessed via click and participation rates, geographic location, BMI, smoking status, and other demographic information.
Methods: Participants were actively recruited via in-app messages using the menstrual tracking app Clue (BioWink GmbH) and a boosted Facebook post by DivaCup (Diva International Inc.). Other passive recruitment methods also took place throughout the recruitment period (eg, email communications, blogs, other social media). The proportion of participants who visited the study website after viewing and clicking the hypertext link (click rates) in the in-app messages and boosted Facebook post and the proportion of participants who completed the surveys per the number of completed consent and eligibility screeners (participation rates) were used to quantify the success of recruiting participants to the study website and study survey completion, respectively. Survey completion was defined as finishing the pregnancy and birth history section of the OM Global Health Study questionnaire.
Results: The recruitment period was from February 27, 2018, through January 24, 2020. In-app messages and the boosted Facebook post were seen by 104,000 and 21,400 people, respectively. Overall, 215 participants started the OM Global Health Study survey, of which 140 (65.1%), 39 (18.1%), and 36 (16.8%) participants were recruited via the app, the boosted Facebook post, and other passive recruitment methods, respectively. The click rate via the app was 18.9% (19,700 clicks/104,000 ad views) and 1.6% via the boosted Facebook post (340 clicks/21,400 ad views.) The overall participation rate was 44.6% (198/444), and the average participant age was 21.8 (SD 6.1) years. In terms of geographic and racial/ethnic diversity, 91 (44.2%) of the participants resided outside the United States and 147 (70.7%) identified as non-Hispanic White. In-app recruitment produced the most geographically diverse stream, with 44 (32.8%) of the 134 participants in Europe, 77 (57.5%) in North America, and 13 (9.8%) in other parts of the world. Both human error and nonhuman procedural breakdowns occurred during the recruitment process, including a computer programming error related to age eligibility and a hacking attempt by an internet bot.
Conclusions: In-app messages using the menstrual tracking app Clue were the most successful method for recruiting participants from many geographic regions and producing the greatest numbers of started and completed surveys. This study demonstrates the utility of digital recruitment to enroll participants from diverse geographic locations and provides some lessons to avoid technical recruitment errors in future digital recruitment strategies for epidemiological research.
Keywords: Facebook; attrition; digital health; digital recruitment; eHealth; epidemiology research; health app; health application; health technology; in-app message; internet; mHealth; menstrual; menstrual health; menstrual tracking app; menstruation; mobile health; ovulation; participant; participation; recruit; reproduction; reproductive health; research subject; social media; tracking app; women's health.
©Erika Rodriguez, Komal Peer, Victoria Fruh, Kaitlyn James, Anna Williams, Alexis de Figueiredo Veiga, Michael R Winter, Amanda Shea, Ann Aschengrau, Kevin J Lane, Shruthi Mahalingaiah. Originally published in JMIR Formative Research (https://formative.jmir.org), 14.09.2022.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of Interest: AS was employed by Clue by BioWink GmbH at the time of the study. All other authors report no conflict of interest.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Evaluation of Menstrual Cycle Tracking Behaviors in the Ovulation and Menstruation Health Pilot Study: Cross-Sectional Study.J Med Internet Res. 2023 Oct 27;25:e42164. doi: 10.2196/42164. J Med Internet Res. 2023. PMID: 37889545 Free PMC article.
-
Effectiveness and Cost of Using Facebook Recruitment to Elicit Canadian Women's Perspectives on Bone Health and Osteoporosis: Cross-Sectional Survey Study.J Med Internet Res. 2023 Sep 29;25:e47970. doi: 10.2196/47970. J Med Internet Res. 2023. PMID: 37773625 Free PMC article.
-
Using Facebook to recruit to a national online survey investigating complementary medicine product use in pregnancy and lactation: A case study of method.Res Social Adm Pharm. 2021 May;17(5):864-874. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2020.07.011. Epub 2020 Aug 10. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2021. PMID: 32855079
-
Menstrual Tracking Mobile App Review by Consumers and Health Care Providers: Quality Evaluations Study.JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2023 Mar 1;11:e40921. doi: 10.2196/40921. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2023. PMID: 36857125 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Innovative Approaches to Menstruation and Fertility Tracking Using Wearable Reproductive Health Technology: Systematic Review.J Med Internet Res. 2024 Feb 15;26:e45139. doi: 10.2196/45139. J Med Internet Res. 2024. PMID: 38358798 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Pew Research Center Internet/Broadband Fact Sheet. [2022-08-09]. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/fact-sheet/internet-broadband/?menu... .
-
- Pew Research Center Mobile Fact Sheet. [2022-08-09]. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/fact-sheet/mobile/
-
- Critchley HO, Babayev E, Bulun SE, Clark S, Garcia-Grau I, Gregersen PK, Kilcoyne A, Kim JJ, Lavender M, Marsh EE, Matteson KA, Maybin JA, Metz CN, Moreno I, Silk K, Sommer M, Simon C, Tariyal R, Taylor HS, Wagner GP, Griffith LG. Menstruation: science and society. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Nov;223(5):624–664. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.06.004. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0002-9378(20)30619-0 S0002-9378(20)30619-0 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Bradley S, Bacharach E. The 11 Best Period Tracker Apps, According to Ob-Gyns. 2019. [2022-08-19]. https://www.womenshealthmag.com/health/g26787041/best-period-tracking-apps/
-
- Schantz JS, Fernandez CSP, Anne Marie Z Jukic. Menstrual cycle tracking applications and the potential for epidemiological research: a comprehensive review of the literature. Curr Epidemiol Rep. 2021 Mar 20;8(1):9–19. doi: 10.1007/s40471-020-00260-3. https://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/34055569 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources