Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Aug 12;6(8):e37163.
doi: 10.2196/37163.

Delivering an mHealth Adherence Support Intervention for Patients With HIV: Mixed Methods Process Evaluation of the Philippines Connect for Life Study

Affiliations

Delivering an mHealth Adherence Support Intervention for Patients With HIV: Mixed Methods Process Evaluation of the Philippines Connect for Life Study

Cara O'Connor et al. JMIR Form Res. .

Abstract

Background: The Philippines HIV epidemic is one of the fastest growing epidemics globally, and infections among men who have sex with men are increasing at an alarming rate. Connect for Life Philippines is a mobile health (mHealth) intervention that supports antiretroviral therapy (ART) adherence in this key population through individualized voice calls and SMS text messages.

Objective: The objective of this process evaluation is to assess the intervention reach, dose delivered and received, fidelity, and acceptability and to describe contextual factors affecting the implementation of an mHealth adherence support intervention for patients on ART in a clinic in Metro Manila, Philippines.

Methods: A mixed methods process evaluation approach was used in an observational cohort study. Quantitative data sources for the process evaluation were call and SMS text message logs obtained from the mHealth platform and questionnaires collected at 12-, 24-, and 48-week study visits. Qualitative data were collected from process reports and through a series of focus group discussions conducted with a subset of participants during the intervention development phase, after an initial 8-week pilot phase, and at the end of the study.

Results: The 462 study participants received 31,095 interactive voice calls and 8234 SMS text messages during the study. Owing to technical issues, intervention fidelity was low, with only 22.1% (102/462) of the participants receiving reminders via voice calls and others (360/462, 77.9%) receiving only SMS text messages during the intervention. After 48 weeks in the study, 63.5% (293/462) of the participants reported that they would be quite likely or very likely to recommend the program to a friend, and 53.8% (249/462) of the participants reported that they benefited quite a bit or very much from the intervention. Participants who were on ART for <6 months at the beginning of the study and those who received the daily or weekly pill reminders were more likely to report that they benefited from the intervention (P=.02 and P=.01, respectively).

Conclusions: The Connect for Life intervention had high participant satisfaction and acceptability, especially among those who received high dose of the intervention. However, poor reliability of local telecommunication networks had a large impact on the intervention's usability, fidelity, and dose received.

Keywords: HIV; MSM; Philippines; adherence; antiretroviral therapy; mHealth; men who have sex with men; mobile health; mobile phone; process evaluation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Connect for Life Philippines mobile health intervention functions. ART: antiretroviral therapy; IVRS: interactive voice response system; PIN: personal identification number.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Intervention theory of change. ART: antiretroviral therapy.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Interactive voice response system calls made and outcomes. PIN: personal identification number.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Intervention acceptability after 48 weeks (n=392 respondents).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. UNAIDS Data 2017. Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) 2017. Jul 20, [2019-07-28]. https://www.unaids.org/en/resources/documents/2017/2017_data_book .
    1. Philippines Country Data 2020. Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) 2020. [2020-11-19]. https://www.aidsdatahub.org/sites/default/files/resource/2020-aids-data-... .
    1. HIV/AIDS and ART Registry of the Philippines (HARP) Report March 2022. National HIV/AIDS & STI Surveillance and Strategic Information Unit. 2022. [2022-05-15]. https://doh.gov.ph/sites/default/files/statistics/EB_HARP_April_AIDSreg2... .
    1. Eustaquio PC, Docken SS, Leyritana KT, Wulandari LP. HIV care cascade among cisgender men who have sex with men in a key population-led community center in the Philippines. Int J STD AIDS. 2021 Jul;32(8):718–28. doi: 10.1177/0956462420987435. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Salvana EM, Samonte GM, Telan E, Leyritana K, Tactacan-Abrenica RJ, Ching PR, Arevalo GM, Dungca NT, Peñalosa-Ramos C, Mendoza KA, Trinidad LF, Tonga AD, Lim J, Destura R, Alejandria M, Solante R, Arcangel L, Palaypayon NS, Schwem BE. High rates of tenofovir failure in a CRF01_AE-predominant HIV epidemic in the Philippines. Int J Infect Dis. 2020 Jun;95:125–32. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.02.020. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1201-9712(20)30078-3 S1201-9712(20)30078-3 - DOI - PubMed