Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Aug 15;24(8):e36316.
doi: 10.2196/36316.

mHealth Interventions to Improve Cancer Screening and Early Detection: Scoping Review of Reviews

Affiliations

mHealth Interventions to Improve Cancer Screening and Early Detection: Scoping Review of Reviews

Désirée Schliemann et al. J Med Internet Res. .

Abstract

Background: Cancer screening provision in resource-constrained settings tends to be opportunistic, and uptake tends to be low, leading to delayed presentation and treatment and poor survival.

Objective: The aim of this study was to identify, review, map, and summarize findings from different types of literature reviews on the use of mobile health (mHealth) technologies to improve the uptake of cancer screening.

Methods: The review methodology was guided by the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews). Ovid MEDLINE, PyscINFO, and Embase were searched from inception to May 2021. The eligible criteria included reviews that focused on studies of interventions that used mobile phone devices to promote and deliver cancer screening and described the effectiveness or implementation of mHealth intervention outcomes. Key data fields such as study aims, types of cancer, mHealth formats, and outcomes were extracted, and the data were analyzed to address the objective of the review.

Results: Our initial search identified 1981 titles, of which 12 (0.61%) reviews met the inclusion criteria (systematic reviews: n=6, 50%; scoping reviews: n=4, 33%; rapid reviews: n=1, 8%; narrative reviews: n=1, 8%). Most (57/67, 85%) of the interventions targeted breast and cervical cancer awareness and screening uptake. The most commonly used mHealth technologies for increasing cancer screening uptake were SMS text messages and telephone calls. Overall, mHealth interventions increased knowledge about screening and had high acceptance among participants. The likelihood of achieving improved uptake-related outcomes increased when interventions used >1 mode of communication (telephone reminders, physical invitation letters, and educational pamphlets) together with mHealth.

Conclusions: mHealth interventions increase cancer screening uptake, although multiple modes used in combination seem to be more effective.

Keywords: cancer; cancer detection; cancer screening; digital health; mHealth; mobile health; mobile phone; oncology; review; scoping review; scoping review of reviews.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) flowchart.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Cancer. World Health Organization. [2022-02-16]. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/cancer .
    1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Nov;68(6):394–424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492. - DOI - DOI - PubMed
    1. Clegg-Lamptey JA, Vanderpuye V, Dedey F. Late presentation of breast cancer in lower- and middle-income countries. Curr Breast Cancer Rep. 2019 Jun 20;11(3):143–51. doi: 10.1007/s12609-019-00312-8. - DOI
    1. Gøtzsche PC, Jørgensen KJ. Screening for breast cancer with mammography. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jun 04;(6):CD001877. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001877.pub5. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/23737396 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jansen EE, Zielonke N, Gini A, Anttila A, Segnan N, Vokó Z, Ivanuš U, McKee M, de Koning HJ, de Kok IM. Response to the letter commenting on 'Effect of organised cervical cancer screening on cervical cancer mortality in Europe: a systematic review'. Eur J Cancer. 2020 Oct;138:232–3. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.07.012.S0959-8049(20)30395-6 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types