Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Aug 25;65(16):11100-11110.
doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.2c00535. Epub 2022 Aug 15.

Therapeutic Potential of a Water-Soluble Silver-Diclofenac Coordination Polymer on 3D Pancreatic Cancer Spheroids

Affiliations

Therapeutic Potential of a Water-Soluble Silver-Diclofenac Coordination Polymer on 3D Pancreatic Cancer Spheroids

Sabina W Jaros et al. J Med Chem. .

Abstract

This work describes the traditional wet and green synthetic approaches, structural features, and extensive bioactivity study for a new coordination polymer [Ag(μ-PTA)(Df)(H2O)]n·3nH2O (1) that bears a silver(I) center, a 1,3,5-triaza-phosphaadamantane (PTA) linker, and a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug, diclofenac (Df-). Compared to cisplatin, compound 1 exhibits both anti-inflammatory properties and very remarkable cytotoxicity toward various cancer cell lines with a high value of selectivity index. Additionally, the 3D model representing human pancreas/duct carcinoma (PANC-1) and human lung adenocarcinoma (A549) was designed and applied as a clear proof of the remarkable therapeutic potential of 1. The obtained experimental data indicate that 1 induces an apoptotic pathway via reactive oxygen species generation, targeting mitochondria due to their membrane depolarization. This study broadens a group of bioactive metal-organic networks and highlights the significant potential of such compounds in developing advanced therapeutic solutions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Figures

Scheme 1
Scheme 1. Simplified Synthetic Procedure for Compound 1
Figure 1
Figure 1
Crystal structure of 1. (a) Connectivity of the Ag atom and ligands. (b) Tooth-like CP and (c) its simplified topological view (2C1 net). Additional details: (a) only NH and H2O hydrogen atoms are shown. The particular elements of the structural skeleton are color-coded as follows: silver (magenta), nitrogen (blue), phosphorus (orange), carbon (pale gray), oxygen (red), chlorine (green), and hydrogen (gray); (b,c) view down the a axis; (c) centroids of μ-PTA (gray) and silver (magenta).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Bright-field images of PANC-1 cells: CTRL BF—untreated cells (bright field), CTRL—untreated cells stained with OA/PI, and images of AO/PI stained PANC-1 cells (72 h after treatment): 1 and PTA, NaDf (diclofenac), and AgNO3 at the respective concentrations based on the molar ratio of 1:1:1 (PTA/NaDf/AgNO3). Cells with normal morphology and intense green nuclei—viable, round red cells—dead. Scale bar: 50 μm.
Figure 3
Figure 3
(A) A549 and (B) PANC-1 3D tumor spheroid model: untreated controls and assessment of the cytotoxicity of compound 1 (C = 0.1, 0.01, and 0.001 mM). PI: propidium iodide (red, death cells), CAM: calcein-AM (green, live cells), Hoechst (blue, nuclei); scale bar: 500 μm. (C) Cell death quantification in spheroids treated with 1 at 0.1 mM; these are presented as average values with standard deviation estimated from three independent tests.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Intracellular concentration of silver (ng Ag per mg of proteins) after incubating PANC-1 with 1 at IC50 for 4–72 h. Concentration of Ag for untreated cells has been omitted because it was less than 0.002 ng Ag per mg of proteins. Data are given as mean ± SEM (*** represents P-value < 0.001, ** P-value < 0.01, and * P-value < 0.5).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Flow cytometry analysis of dead and viable cells by staining with PI/annexin V–FITC. (A) Representative plots for PANC-1 cells following 24 h treatment with increased concentration of 1. (B) Percentage dependence of viable cells (annexin V-(−)), necrosis (annexin V(−) and PI(+)), early apoptosis (annexin V(+) and PI(−)), and late apoptosis (annexin V(+) and PI(−)). Data refer to mean ± SD on the basis of three tests. Table S2 contains additional data on statistical significance (Supporting Information).
Figure 6
Figure 6
(A) Confocal images of PANC-1 cells treated with 1 and in situ ROS generation after 4 h of incubation. CTRL—untreated control, bright-field image; untreated—cells’ fluorescence image after treatment with 1; CTRL(+) pyo—cells’ image after treatment with pyocyanin (pyo) during 4 h; positive control and 1—cells’ image after treatment with 1, analyzed after 4 h (λem 524 nm, λex 505 nm); scale bar: 50 μm. (B) Level of oxidative stress induced in PANC-1 cells during treatment with 1, PTA, NaDf, and AgNO3 expressed as fluorescence intensity dependence on time (up to 6 h). Pyocyanin- untreated and -treated cells were applied as ROS negative and positive control tests, respectively. (C) Changes of mitochondrial membrane potential by a mitochondrial probe JC-10 for 1, PTA, NaDf, AgNO3, and controls (ciprofloxacin and gentamicin) at respective concentrations based on the molar ratio 1:1:1, incubation time: 4 h. (D) Cleavage of the pBR322 plasmid (agarose gel electrophoresis experiment) in the presence of (A) PTA and NaDf and (B) 1 in dimethylformamide (DMF) (typically 10% DMF solution) at different concentrations (1, 50, and 500 μM) and incubation times (72, 48, and 24 h). (e) Densitometry analysis of plasmid cleavage by 1 (X axis: time [h]; Y axis: % plasmid forms). Data are given as mean ± SD (*** represents P-value < 0.001, ** P-value < 0.01, and * P-value < 0.5).
Figure 7
Figure 7
(a) IL-6 and (b) TNF-α production measured after incubation with 1 (c = 1 μM), ctr(−) supernatant of untreated cells, ctrl(+) IL6, and TFN-a, respectively. Data are represented as mean ± SD (*** represents P-value < 0.001, ** P-value < 0.01, and * P-value < 0.5).

References

    1. Zhou Z.; Vázquez-González M.; Willner I. Stimuli-responsive metal-organic framework nanoparticles for controlled drug delivery and medical applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2021, 50, 4541–4563. 10.1039/d0cs01030h. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Liu W.; Yan Q.; Xia C.; Wang X.; Kumar A.; Wang Y.; Liu Y.; Pan Y.; Liu J. Recent advances in cell membrane coated metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) for tumor therapy. J. Mater. Chem. B 2021, 9, 4459–4474. 10.1039/d1tb00453k. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cai H.; Huang X.-L.; Li D. Biological metal-organic frameworks: Structures, host-guest chemistry and bio-applications. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2019, 378, 207–221. 10.1016/j.ccr.2017.12.003. - DOI
    1. Rojas S.; Devic T.; Horcajada P. Metal organic frameworks based on bioactive components. J. Mater. Chem. B 2017, 5, 2560–2573. 10.1039/c6tb03217f. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chu Y.; Hou J.; Boyer C.; Richardson J. J.; Liang K.; Xu J. Biomimetic synthesis of coordination network materials: Recent advances in MOFs and MPNs. Appl. Mater. Today 2018, 10, 93–105. 10.1016/j.apmt.2017.12.009. - DOI

Publication types