Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Aug 15;17(8):e0272321.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272321. eCollection 2022.

Clients satisfaction at primary healthcare facilities and its association with implementation of client service charter in Tanzania

Erick S Kinyenje  1 , Talhiya A Yahya  1 , Mbwana M Degeh  1 , Chrisogone C German  1 , Joseph C Hokororo  1 , Mohamed A Mohamed  2   3 , Omary A Nassoro  1 , Radenta P Bahegwa  1 , Yohanes S Msigwa  1 , Ruth R Ngowi  1 , Laura E Marandu  1 , Syabo M Mwaisengela  4 , Eliudi S Eliakimu  1
Affiliations

Clients satisfaction at primary healthcare facilities and its association with implementation of client service charter in Tanzania

Erick S Kinyenje et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: Client service charter (CSC) provides information about what people can expect in a facility's services; what is expected of clients and service providers. Tanzania implemented Star Rating Assessment (SRA) of primary health care (PHC) facilities in 2015/16 and 2017/18 using SRA tools with 12 service areas. This paper assesses the status of service area 7, namely client focus that checked if client was satisfied with services provided and implementation of CSC through three indicators-if: CSC was displayed; CSC was monitored; client feedback mechanism and complaints handling was in place.

Methods: We extracted and performed a cross-sectional secondary data analysis of data related to clients' focus that are found in national SRA database of 2017/2018 using STATA version 15. Client satisfaction was regarded as dependent variable while facility characteristics plus three indicators of CSC as independent variables. Multivariate logistic regression with p-value of 5% and 95% confidence interval (CI) were applied.

Results: A total of 4,523 facilities met our inclusion criteria; 3,987 (88.2%) were dispensaries, 408 (9.0%) health centres and 128 (2.8%) hospitals. CSC was displayed in 69.1% facilities, monitored in 32.4% facilities, and 32.5% of the facilities had mechanisms for clients' feedback and handling complaints. The overall prevalence of clients' satisfaction was 72.8%. Clients' satisfaction was strongly associated with all implementation indicators of CSC. Clients from urban-based facilities had 21% increased satisfaction compared rural-based facilities (AOR 1.21; 95%CI: 1.00-1.46); and clients from hospitals had 39% increased satisfaction compared to dispensaries (AOR 1.39; 95%CI: 1.10-1.77).

Conclusion: The implementation of CSC is low among Tanzanian PHC facilities. Clients are more satisfied if received healthcare services from facilities that display the charter, monitor its implementation, have mechanisms to obtain clients feedback and handle complaints. Clients' satisfaction at PHC could be improved through adoption and implementation of CSC.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

We have read the journal’s policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: During the time of baseline and reassessment as well as during write up of the study – JH, EE and TY were with the Health Quality Assurance Divison (now called Health Quality Assurance Unit) and were responsible for the implementation of SRA and QIPs folllow-up. However, this does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Conceptual framework for implementation of client service charter in health facilities.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Proportion of primary healthcare facilities whose clients are satisfied with services and the status of implementation of clients’ service charter in Tanzania.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Proportion of Tanzanian primary health facilities whose clients were satisfied with services during star rating assessment 2017/118.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. World Health Organization and the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF). Declaration of Astana. Astana, Kazakhstan 25–26 October, 2018; Global Conference on Primary Health Care. WHO/HIS/SDS/2018.61 2018 [26/10/2021]. Available from: https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/primary-health/declaration/gcphc...
    1. World Health Organization. Declaration of Astana: Global Conference on Primary Health Care: Astana, Kazakhstan, 25 and 26 October 2018. World Health Organization; 2019.
    1. Arsenault C, Kim MK, Aryal A, Faye A, Joseph JP, Kassa M, et al. Hospital-provision of essential primary care in 56 countries: determinants and quality. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 2020;98(11):735 doi: 10.2471/BLT.19.245563 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Yahya T, Mohamed M. Raising a mirror to quality of care in Tanzania: the five-star assessment. The Lancet Global Health. 2018;6(11):e1155–e7 doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30348-6 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kinyenje E, Hokororo J, Eliakimu E, Yahya T, Mbwele B, Mohamed M, et al. Status of Infection Prevention and Control in Tanzanian Primary Health Care Facilities: Learning From Star Rating Assessment. Infection Prevention in Practice. 2020;2(3):100071 doi: 10.1016/j.infpip.2020.100071 - DOI - PMC - PubMed