Estrogen therapy and breast cancer in randomized clinical trials: a narrative review
- PMID: 35969882
- DOI: 10.1097/GME.0000000000002021
Estrogen therapy and breast cancer in randomized clinical trials: a narrative review
Abstract
Importance and objective: In the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) randomized trial with 10,739 postmenopausal women with prior hysterectomy, conjugated equine estrogen (CEE) alone significantly reduced breast cancer incidence and breast cancer mortality. In contrast, epidemiological studies in a meta-analysis from the Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer (Collaborative Group) with 108,647 breast cancers and the Million Women's Study cohort significantly associated estrogen-alone therapy with higher breast cancer incidence and breast cancer mortality. The Collaborative Group included a meta-analysis of five smaller randomized trials and the WHI randomized trial; however, findings were restricted to the Collaborative Group appendix. Our objective is to facilitate understanding of these discordant results.
Methods: Data sources supporting our review findings include the randomized WHI CEE-alone trial and the meta-analysis of five smaller randomized trials evaluating estrogen alone. We summarize the smaller randomized trials' details of breast cancer relevance and place the findings in clinical context. We review findings of the WHI randomized trial evaluating CEE alone in the context of issues raised by Collaborative Group and the Million Women Study authors. We trace the evolution of the time-from-menopause, "window of opportunity" concept and augment the Collaborative Group meta-analysis by including the most recent WHI findings.
Discussion and conclusions: Consideration of the smaller randomized trials evaluating estrogen alone with breast cancer signals that the WHI findings of lower breast cancer incidence and lower breast cancer mortality with CEE-alone use are not a "stand-alone" outcome or due to the play of chance. The serial reports of consistent favorable breast cancer findings through 20 years of cumulative follow-up suggest CEE-alone use initiates changes that persist. After full consideration of risks and benefits, randomized trial evidence provides reassurance for postmenopausal women with prior hysterectomy who are close to menopause considering estrogen alone for climacteric symptom management.
Copyright © 2022 by The North American Menopause Society.
Conflict of interest statement
Financial disclosure/conflicts of interest: R.T.C. is a consultant to Novartis, AstraZeneca, and Puma and received honorarium from Novartis and AstraZeneca. None of the other authors report any conflict of interest related to this study.
Comment in
-
Reassuring data regarding the use of hormone therapy at menopause and risk of breast cancer.Menopause. 2022 Sep 1;29(9):1001-1004. doi: 10.1097/GME.0000000000002057. Epub 2022 Aug 23. Menopause. 2022. PMID: 35998670 No abstract available.
References
-
- Anderson GL, Manson J, Wallace R, et al. Implementation of the Women's Health Initiative study design. Ann Epidemiol 2003;13(9 suppl):S5–S17.
-
- Rich-Edwards JW, Corsano KA, Stampfer MJ. Test of the National Death Index and Equifax Nationwide Death Search. Am J Epidemiol 1994;140:1016–1019.
-
- Chlebowski RT, Anderson GL, Aragaki AK, et al. Association of menopausal hormone therapy with breast cancer incidence and mortality during long-term follow-up of the Women’s Health Initiative randomized clinical trials. JAMA 2020;324:369–380.
-
- Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer. Type and timing of menopausal hormone therapy and breast cancer risk: individual participant meta-analysis of the worldwide epidemiological evidence. Lancet 2019;394:1159–1168.
-
- Beral V, Peto R, Pirie K, Reeves G. Menopausal hormone therapy and 20-year breast cancer mortality. Lancet 2019;394:1139
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
