Preventable operating room delays in robotic-assisted thoracic surgery: Identifying opportunities for cost reduction
- PMID: 35970610
- PMCID: PMC10020819
- DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2022.06.038
Preventable operating room delays in robotic-assisted thoracic surgery: Identifying opportunities for cost reduction
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to characterize the types of intraoperative delays during robotic-assisted thoracic surgery, operating room staff awareness/perceptions of delays, and cost impact of delays on overall operative costs.
Methods: Robotic-assisted thoracic surgery cases from May to August 2019 were attended by 3 third-party observers to record intraoperative delays. The postoperative surveys were given to operating room staff to elicit perceived delays. Observed versus perceived delays were compared using the McNemar test. Direct costs and charges per delay were calculated.
Results: Forty-four cases were observed, of which a majority were lobectomies (n = 38 [86%]). A total of 71 delays were recorded by observers, encompassing 75% of cases (n = 33), with an average delay length of 3.6 minutes (±5.3 minutes). The following delays were observed: equipment failure (n = 40, average delay length 5.0 minutes (±6.5 minutes), equipment missing (n = 15, 2.2 minutes [±1.4 minutes]), staff unfamiliarity with equipment (n = 4, 3.4 minutes [± 1.5 minutes]), and other (n = 12, 4.5 minutes [±5.3 minutes]). The detection rates for any intraoperative delay were consistently lower for all of the operating room team members compared with observers, including surgeons (34.3% vs 77.1%; P = .0003), first assistants (41.9% vs 74.2%; P = .0075), surgical technologists (39.4% vs 72.7%; P = .0045), and circulating nurses (41.18% vs 76.47% minutes; P = .0013). The average operating room variable direct cost of delays based on the average total delay length per case was $225.52 (±$350.18) and was 1.6% (range 0-10.6%) of the total case charges.
Conclusion: The lack of perception of intraoperative delays hinders operating teams from effectively closing the variable cost gaps. Future studies are needed to explore methods of increasing perception of delays and opportunities to improve operating room efficiency.
Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
COI/DISCLOSURES
DMD has served as a consultant and obtained speaker fees from Intuitive Surgical. REM has obtained speaker fees from Intuitive Surgical. DMK, RLA, MAR, MMT, GMT, TAR, and PJK have no biomedical financial interests or potential conflicts of interest to disclose.
Figures


Similar articles
-
The cost of operating room delays in an endourology center.Can Urol Assoc J. 2020 Jul;14(7):E304-E308. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.6099. Can Urol Assoc J. 2020. PMID: 32017697 Free PMC article.
-
Successful strategies for improving operating room efficiency at academic institutions.Anesth Analg. 1998 Apr;86(4):896-906. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199804000-00039. Anesth Analg. 1998. PMID: 9539621
-
Hospital cost and clinical effectiveness of robotic-assisted versus video-assisted thoracoscopic and open lobectomy: A propensity score-weighted comparison.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019 May;157(5):2018-2026.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.12.101. Epub 2019 Jan 23. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019. PMID: 30819575
-
Robotic-Assisted Videothoracoscopic Surgery of the Lung.Cancer Control. 2015 Jul;22(3):314-25. doi: 10.1177/107327481502200309. Cancer Control. 2015. PMID: 26351887 Review.
-
Starting and Developing a Robotic Thoracic Surgery Program.Thorac Surg Clin. 2023 Feb;33(1):11-17. doi: 10.1016/j.thorsurg.2022.07.008. Thorac Surg Clin. 2023. PMID: 36372528 Review.
References
-
- NHE Fact Sheet | CMS [Internet]. [cited 2021 Oct 27]. Available from: https://www.cms.gov/Research-Statistics-Data-and-Systems/Statistics-Tren...
-
- Keehan SP, Cuckler GA, Poisal JA, Sisko AM, Smith SD, Madison AJ, Rennie KE, Fiore JA, Hardesty JC. National Health Expenditure Projections, 2019–28: Expected Rebound In Prices Drives Rising Spending Growth. Health Affairs. 2020. Apr 1;39(4):704–714. - PubMed
-
- Dyas AR, Lovell KM, Balentine CJ, Wang TN, Porterfield JR, Chen H, Lindeman BM. Reducing cost and improving operating room efficiency: examination of surgical instrument processing. Journal of Surgical Research. 2018. Sep;229:15–19. - PubMed
-
- Chapman WC, Luo X, Doyle M, Khan A, Chapman WC, Kangrga I, Martin J, Wellen J. Time Is Money: Can Punctuality Decrease Operating Room Cost? Journal of the American College of Surgeons. 2020. Feb;230(2):182–189.e4. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources