Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Aug 15;22(1):641.
doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04946-y.

Development and validation of a predictive model to identify the active phase of labor

Affiliations

Development and validation of a predictive model to identify the active phase of labor

Simona Fumagalli et al. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. .

Abstract

Background: The diagnosis of the active phase of labor is a crucial clinical decision, thus requiring an accurate assessment. This study aimed to build and to validate a predictive model, based on maternal signs and symptoms to identify a cervical dilatation ≥4 cm.

Methods: A prospective study was conducted from May to September 2018 in a II Level Maternity Unit (development data), and from May to September 2019 in a I Level Maternity Unit (validation data). Women with singleton, term pregnancy, cephalic presentation and presence of contractions were consecutively enrolled during the initial assessment to diagnose the stage of labor. Women < 18 years old, with language barrier or induction of labor were excluded. A nomogram for the calculation of the predictions of cervical dilatation ≥4 cm on the ground of 11 maternal signs and symptoms was obtained from a multivariate logistic model. The predictive performance of the model was investigated by internal and external validation.

Results: A total of 288 assessments were analyzed. All maternal signs and symptoms showed a significant impact on increasing the probability of cervical dilatation ≥4 cm. In the final logistic model, "Rhythm" (OR 6.26), "Duration" (OR 8.15) of contractions and "Show" (OR 4.29) confirmed their significance while, unexpectedly, "Frequency" of contractions had no impact. The area under the ROC curve in the model of the uterine activity was 0.865 (development data) and 0.927 (validation data), with an increment to 0.905 and 0.956, respectively, when adding maternal signs. The Brier Score error in the model of the uterine activity was 0.140 (development data) and 0.097 (validation data), with a decrement to 0.121 and 0.092, respectively, when adding maternal signs.

Conclusion: Our predictive model showed a good performance. The introduction of a non-invasive tool might assist midwives in the decision-making process, avoiding interventions and thus offering an evidenced-base care.

Keywords: Active labor; Active phase; Maternal behavior; Midwifery diagnosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flowchart on women involved in the study in both development and validation settings
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Nomogram. The predicted probability of cervical dilatation ≥4 cm is calculated in three steps: 1) the score of each signs is obtained by the vertical projection (from “NO”, “YES”) to the score axis, 2) the total score is then calculated by summing up the single score values, 3) probability of need of of cervical dilatation ≥4 cm is calculated by the vertical projection of the total score value to the to the probability of cervical dilatation ≥4 cm
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Box plot. The predicted probability of cervical dilatation ≥4 cm is represented in the two groups defined by the observed dilatation (≥4 cm or < 4 cm) in development and validation data
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
ROC curve. The ROC curve of the predicted probability of cervical dilatation ≥4 cm is represented in development (Panel A) and validation (Panel B) data

References

    1. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (2014), Intrapartum Care for Healthy Women and Babies (NICE Guideline 190). Updated February 2017.; 2017.
    1. Hofmeyr GJ, Bernitz S, Bonet M, et al. WHO next-generation partograph: revolutionary steps towards individualised labor care BJOG Published online March 2021. doi:10.1111/1471-0528.16694. - PMC - PubMed
    1. WHO recommendations on intrapartum Care for a Positive Childbirth Experience; 2018. - PubMed
    1. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologist Committee Opinion no. 766: approaches to limit intervention during labor and birth. Obstet Gynecol 2019;133(2):e164–e173. doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000003074. - PubMed
    1. Cheyne H, Dowding DW, Hundley V. Making the diagnosis of labor: midwives’ diagnostic judgement and management decisions. J Adv Nurs. 2006;53(6):625–635. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.03769.x. - DOI - PubMed