Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Aug 16:27:e936514.
doi: 10.12659/AOT.936514.

Evaluation of Deceased Donor Kidney Transplantation in the Eurotransplant Senior Program in Comparison to Standard Allocation

Affiliations

Evaluation of Deceased Donor Kidney Transplantation in the Eurotransplant Senior Program in Comparison to Standard Allocation

Nelly Delali Eklou et al. Ann Transplant. .

Abstract

BACKGROUND The organ shortage and long waiting times have dramatically increased the age of potential kidney transplant recipients. The Eurotransplant Senior Program (ESP) was initiated to allocate kidneys from deceased donors aged ≥65 years to recipients with a comparable age independent of pre-transplant human leucocyte antigen (HLA) matching; however, parameters affecting the long-term benefits of this strategy remain poorly defined. MATERIAL AND METHODS We retrospectively evaluated outcome and risk factors for mortality in kidney recipients aged ≥65 years that were transplanted according to the ESP protocol relative to patients aged >50 years transplanted according to the Eurotransplant kidney allocation system (ETKAS) criteria at the University Freiburg Medical Center, Germany, between 2008 and 2018. RESULTS Graft survival, graft function, the maintenance immunosuppressive therapy, and the incidence of rejections and infections did not differ between groups. Infectious diseases were the main cause of death in both groups; however, infection-associated mortality was more than double in the ESP group, and 5-year patient survival was 61.4% in the ESP group compared to 83.2% in the ETKAS group. Multivariate analysis identified age, the number of HLA mismatches, and the CMV serostatus with a seropositive donor and negative recipient as the main risk factors for mortality. CONCLUSIONS A comparable immunosuppressive regimen used in ESP and ETKAS patients was associated with similar rejection rates and infectious disease complications, and infections were the most common cause of death in both groups. CMV-negative patients receiving an organ from a CMV-positive donor and patients with a high number of HLA mismatches require close follow-up to reduce mortality.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: None declared

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Acute rejection after kidney transplantation. (A) Proportion of different type of rejections following transplantation. The percentage of rejections refers to the total number of rejections. (B) Kaplan-Meier plot illustrating survival free from rejection by organ allocation method. ESP – Eurotransplant Senior Program; ETKAS – Eurotransplant Kidney Allocation System. (GraphPad Prism version 8.0, GraphPad Software, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Graft loss and graft function. (A) Kaplan-Meier plot illustrating survival free from graft loss by organ allocation method. (B) Graft function following kidney transplantation as assessed by serum creatinine levels. ESP – Eurotransplant Senior Program; ETKAS – Eurotransplant Kidney Allocation System. * P<0.05. (GraphPad Prism version 8.0, GraphPad Software, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Mortality and cause of death. (A) Kaplan-Meier plot illustrating survival by organ allocation method and (B) Cause of death by organ allocation method. The percentage of cause of death refers to the total number of patients. ESP – Eurotransplant Senior Program; ETKAS – Eurotransplant Kidney Allocation System. * P<0.05. (GraphPad Prism version 8.0, GraphPad Software, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Infectious diseases. (A) Kaplan-Meier plot illustrating survival free from infections by organ allocation method. (B) Incidence of infections according to different pathogens. The percentage of pathogens refers to the total number of patients. (C) Incidence of infections according to different localizations. (D) Incidence of different viral infections. ESP – Eurotransplant Senior Program; ETKAS – Eurotransplant Kidney Allocation System. * P<0.05. (GraphPad Prism version 8.0, GraphPad Software, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. [Accessed on December 05, 2018]. www.usrds.org/qtr/default.aspx .
    1. Yu MY, Kim YC, Lee JP, et al. Death with graft function after kidney transplantation: A single-center experience. Clin Exp Nephrol. 2018;22(3):710–18. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Meier-Kriesche HU, Schold JD, Gaston RS, et al. Kidneys from deceased donors: Maximizing the value of a scarce resource. Am J Transplant. 2005;5(7):1725–30. - PubMed
    1. Eurotransplant. 2019. https://www.eurotransplant.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Annual-Report-... .
    1. Darmady EM. Transplantation and the ageing kidney. Lancet. 1974;2(7888):1046–47. - PubMed

Substances