New-onset Parkinsonism as a Covid-19 infection sequela: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

Background: There remains a scarcity of literature regarding COVID-19 and its neurological sequelae. This study highlights Parkinsonism as a post-COVID-19 sequela and helps us understand a possible link between the two.

Methods: A literature search covering relevant databases was conducted for studies reporting the development of Parkinsonism in patients recovering from COVID-19 infection. A quality assessment tool developed by The Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal tools for the assessment of case reports was utilized. Fisher's exact test was used to explore the factors associated with COVID-19 and Parkinsonism as its complication.

Results: Ten studies were included in our study. The median age of patients was 60.0, with an interquartile range of 42.5-72.0. There were 8 males (61.5%) patients, and 53.8% of cases were reported to have at least one comorbidity. Cogwheel rigidity was the most common symptom of Parkinsonism in 11 patients. While the most standard treatment modality used was Levodopa in 76.9% of cases. Using the Fisher's Exact test, it was identified that 10 patients (76.9%) with bradykinesia made a full recovery.

Conclusion: Despite presumed "recovery" from COVID-19, patients still face a wide range of neurological complications. One of these complications presenting as Parkinsonism requires health care professionals to be on the lookout for the long-term effects of COVID-19. Hence, our study provides information on the possible likely hood of a link between COVID-19 and the development of Parkinsonism as post-COVID neurological sequelae.

Keywords: COVID-19; Corona virus disease; Parkinson's disease; Parkinsonism; SARS-CoV-2.

Fig. 1

PRISMA 2020 flow diagram for new systematic reviews which included searches of databases, registers and other sources *Consider, if feasible to do so, reporting the number of records identified from each database or register searched (rather than the total number across all databases/registers). **If automation tools were used, indicate how many records were excluded by a human and how many were excluded by automation tools. From: Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021; 372:n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71. For more information, visit: http://www.prisma-statement.org/.