Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Feb;31(1):98-103.
doi: 10.1177/15266028221116745. Epub 2022 Aug 16.

Use of Covered Stents in Cannulation Sites as a Last Option to Salvage Failing Vascular Access

Affiliations

Use of Covered Stents in Cannulation Sites as a Last Option to Salvage Failing Vascular Access

Johannes W Drouven et al. J Endovasc Ther. 2024 Feb.

Abstract

Purpose: Controversy exists regarding the treatment of recurrent stenosis in vascular access at cannulation sites with a covered stent as repeated cannulation may damage the stent. The purpose of this study was to review covered stent placement at cannulation sites to salvage failing vascular access.

Materials and methods: A total of 11 patients were included for the purpose of this study. Eight patients (72.7%) received a covered stent due to recurrent stenosis, 2 (18.2%) due to an acute occlusion, and in 1 case (9.1%), the covered stent was used to repair a damaged polytetrafluoroethylene arteriovenous graft (PTFE AVG).

Results: Primary patency after stent placement was 40.9% at 6 months, primary-assisted patency was 79.5% at 12 months, and secondary patency was 80% at 24 months. No significant problems were observed during the dialysis sessions after stent placement. The intervention rate per patient-year was not significantly different before or after covered stent placement, at 3.8 (IQR=9.5) interventions per year versus 2.5 (IQR=3.0) interventions per year (p=0.280).

Conclusion: In conclusion, treating failing vascular access with problems at cannulation sites with covered stents can be considered.

Clinical impact: Treating vascular access stenosis at cannulation sites with covered stents can successfully prolong vascular access life.

Keywords: covered stent graft; endovascular treatment/therapy; hemodialysis; puncture; vascular access.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Kaplan–Meier survival curve. Dashed lines represent a value with a standard error of more than 10%.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
X-ray of covered stents in different patients. (A) After 6 months of cannulation. (B) After approximately 12 months of cannulation. (C) After 18 months of cannulation. (D) An angiographic example of a covered stent after approximately 2 years of cannulation.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Vascular Access Work Group. Clinical practice guidelines for vascular access. Am J Kidney Dis. 2006;48(suppl 1):248. - PubMed
    1. Schmidli J, Widmer MK, Basile C, et al. Editor’s choice—vascular access: 2018 clinical practice guidelines of the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS). Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2018;55(6):757–818. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2018.02.001. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Haskal ZJ, Saad TF, Hoggard JG, et al. Prospective, randomized, concurrently-controlled study of a stent graft versus balloon angioplasty for treatment of arteriovenous access graft stenosis: 2-year results of the RENOVA study. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2016;27(8):1105–1114. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2016.05.019. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Vesely T, DaVanzo W, Behrend T, et al. Balloon angioplasty versus Viabahn stent graft for treatment of failing or thrombosed prosthetic hemodialysis grafts. J Vasc Surg. 2016;64(5):1400–1410.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.04.035. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Haskal ZJ, Trerotola S, Dolmatch B, et al. Stent graft versus balloon angioplasty for failing dialysis-access grafts. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(6):494–503. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0902045. - DOI - PubMed