Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Oct 20;31(R1):R73-R83.
doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddac198.

Demystifying non-coding GWAS variants: an overview of computational tools and methods

Affiliations
Review

Demystifying non-coding GWAS variants: an overview of computational tools and methods

Marijn Schipper et al. Hum Mol Genet. .

Abstract

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have found the majority of disease-associated variants to be non-coding. Major efforts into the charting of the non-coding regulatory landscapes have allowed for the development of tools and methods which aim to aid in the identification of causal variants and their mechanism of action. In this review, we give an overview of current tools and methods for the analysis of non-coding GWAS variants in disease. We provide a workflow that allows for the accumulation of in silico evidence to generate novel hypotheses on mechanisms underlying disease and prioritize targets for follow-up study using non-coding GWAS variants. Lastly, we discuss the need for comprehensive benchmarks and novel tools for the analysis of non-coding variants.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Workflow from non-coding variants to disease insights. Relevant annotation and visualization tools are highlighted in Table 1. Pathogenicity prediction tools are listed in Table 2. Tools and methods for MolQTL analysis are listed in Table 3. Finally, tools and methods for functional mapping and integration of experimental SNP-to-gene data can be found in Table 4.

References

    1. Graur, D., Zheng, Y., Price, N., Azevedo, R.B.R., Zufall, R.A. and Elhaik, E. (2013) On the immortality of television sets: “Function” in the human genome according to the evolution-free gospel of ENCODE. Genome Biol. Evol., 5, 578–590. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Doolittle, W.F. (2013) Is junk DNA bunk? A critique of ENCODE. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 110, 5294–5300. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dunham, I., Kundaje, A., Aldred, S.F., Collins, P.J., Davis, C.A., Doyle, F., Epstein, C.B., Frietze, S., Harrow, J., Kaul, R. et al. (2012) An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome. Nature, 489, 57–74. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pennisi, E. (2012) ENCODE project writes eulogy for junk DNA. Science, 337, 1159–1161. - PubMed
    1. Barrett, L.W., Fletcher, S. and Wilton, S.D. (2012) Regulation of eukaryotic gene expression by the untranslated gene regions and other non-coding elements. Cell. Mol. Life Sci., 69, 3613–3634. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms