Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Dec 1;106(12):2448-2455.
doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000004238. Epub 2022 Aug 2.

Impact of Sensitization on Waiting Time Prior to Kidney Transplantation in Germany

Daniel Zecher  1 , Florian Zeman  2 , Thomas Drasch  1 , Ineke Tieken  3 , Sebastiaan Heidt  4   5 , Geert W Haasnoot  5 , Serge Vogelaar  3 , Axel Rahmel  6 , Bernhard Banas  1
Affiliations

Impact of Sensitization on Waiting Time Prior to Kidney Transplantation in Germany

Daniel Zecher et al. Transplantation. .

Abstract

Background: Assignment of unacceptable HLA mismatches (UAMs) prevents transplantation of incompatible grafts but potentially prolongs waiting time. Whether this is true in the Eurotransplant Kidney Allocation System (ETKAS) and the Eurotransplant Senior Program in Germany is highly debated and relevant for UAM policies.

Methods: Donor pool restriction due to UAM was expressed as percent virtual panel-reactive antibodies (vPRAs). Kaplan-Meier estimates and multivariable Cox regression models were used to analyze the impact of vPRA levels on waiting time and transplant probability during a period of 2 y in all patients eligible for a kidney graft unter standard circumstances in Germany on February 1, 2019 (n = 6533). Utility of the mismatch probability score to compensate for sensitization in ETKAS was also investigated.

Results: In ETKAS, donor pool restriction resulted in significant prolongation of waiting time and reduction in transplant probability only in patients with vPRA levels above 85%. This was most evident in patients with vPRA levels above 95%, whereas patients in the acceptable mismatch program had significantly shorter waiting times and higher chances for transplantation than nonsensitized patients. In the Eurotransplant Senior Program, vPRA levels above 50% resulted in significantly longer waiting times and markedly reduced the chance for transplantation. Compensation for sensitization by the mismatch probability score was insufficient.

Conclusions: Donor pool restriction had no significant impact on waiting time in most sensitized patients. However, despite the existence of the acceptable mismatch program, the majority of highly sensitized patients is currently disadvantaged and would benefit from better compensation mechanisms.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no funding or conflicts of interest.

Comment in

References

    1. Patel R, Terasaki PI. Significance of the positive crossmatch test in kidney transplantation. N Engl J Med. 1969;280:735–739.
    1. Ziemann M, Suwelack B, Banas B, et al. Determination of unacceptable HLA antigen mismatches in kidney transplant recipients. HLA. 2021;100:3–17.
    1. Böhmig GA, Hidalgo LG. Single-antigen bead assays to define unacceptable antigen mismatches? Transplantation. 2018;102:894–895.
    1. Parsons RF, Locke JE, Redfield RR 3rd, et al. Kidney transplantation of highly sensitized recipients under the new kidney allocation system: a reflection from five different transplant centers across the United States. Hum Immunol. 2017;78:30–36.
    1. Zecher D, Bach C, Staudner C, et al. Characteristics of donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies and outcome in renal transplant patients treated with a standardized induction regimen. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2017;32:730–737.