Parental Ability to Assess Pediatric Vital Signs

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate parents' ability to accurately assess their child's heart and respiratory rates (RRs) in the context of potential utility for telehealth visits.

Study design: In this controlled study of 203 child-parent pairs, parents measured their child's heart rate (HR) using 4 methods: palpation, auscultation, and 2 photoplethysmographic smartphone applications. Parents measured RR by inspecting the child and tapping the smartphone application. The gold standards were electrocardiogram for the HR and the child's breaths measured by a health care professional for 60 seconds for the RR. We plotted the measurements using a Bland-Altman plot with 95% limits of agreement.

Results: Parents underestimated HR by palpation with a calculated bias of -18 beats per minute (bpm) (SD, 19), with limits of agreement ranging from -56 to 19 bpm. Parents overestimated and underestimated HR by auscultation with limits of agreement ranging from -53 to 46 bpm. Smartphone applications did not improve the accuracy of measurements. The accuracy of parental RR measurements was low. For young children, bias was -0.8 breaths per minute (brpm) (SD, 9.8) with limits of agreement from -20 to 19 brpm, and for older children, bias was 0.9 brpm (SD 7.4) with limits of agreement from 6 to 15 brpm. The sensitivity of parental subjective opinion to recognize accelerated RR was 37% (95% CI, 25%-51%).

Conclusion: Parents were not able to assess their child's RR or HR accurately. Digital remote assessment of children should not rely on parental measurements of vital signs.

Keywords: ECG; emergency department; heart rate; pulse oximeter; respiratory rate; smartphone application; telehealth; virtual care.