Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Oct 3;32(10):1250-1257.
doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2022-003492.

Patient-reported outcomes in the GARNET trial in patients with advanced or recurrent mismatch repair-deficient/microsatellite instability-high endometrial cancer treated with dostarlimab

Affiliations

Patient-reported outcomes in the GARNET trial in patients with advanced or recurrent mismatch repair-deficient/microsatellite instability-high endometrial cancer treated with dostarlimab

Rebecca Kristeleit et al. Int J Gynecol Cancer. .

Abstract

Objective: There is an increase in patient-reported outcome assessments to gain information on new drug candidates from the patient's perspective. A data gap remains in patient-reported outcome measurements for anti-programmed death 1 (anti-PD-1) therapies in endometrial cancer. We present patient-reported outcome measures collected from patients with mismatch repair-deficient/microsatellite instability-high advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer treated with dostarlimab, an anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody, in an expansion cohort of the GARNET trial.

Methods: GARNET (NCT02715284) is a phase I single-arm study of dostarlimab monotherapy in multiple tumor types. Patients with advanced or recurrent mismatch repair-deficient/microsatellite instability-high endometrial cancer were treated with 500 mg of intravenous dostarlimab once every 3 weeks for four cycles, then 1000 mg of intravenous dostarlimab every 6 weeks. Patient-reported outcome assessments were an exploratory endpoint, measured using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30).

Results: At data cut-off, 88 patients with mismatch repair-deficient endometrial cancer were included in the analysis. Patient-reported outcome assessment completion was >95.5% throughout cycle 7 of the trial, with no individual domain completion <90.9%. Quality of life, emotional functioning, and social functioning showed improvement compared with baseline. All symptom scores showed either improvement or stability from baseline through cycle 7. Categorical change in response across all symptom scales and single-item response scores showed stability or improvement for most patients. For patients who saw a worsening of their categorical change in response, ≤7.4% experienced a 2-category worsening and ≤2.5% experienced a 3-category worsening.

Conclusions: Most patients remained stable or had improved quality of life while receiving dostarlimab for the treatment of recurrent or advanced mismatch repair-deficient endometrial cancer.

Trial registration number: NCT02715284.

Keywords: Endometrium; Quality of Life (PRO)/Palliative Care; Uterine Cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: RK reports grants from Clovis and MSD; honoraria and consultancy fees from AstraZeneca, Basilea Pharmaceutica, Clovis, Eisai, Incyte, MSD, and PharmaMar; and personal fees from GSK. CM reports institutional grants from GSK. AR reports institutional grants from Eisai, PharmaMar, and Roche; and advisory roles at AstraZeneca, GSK, PharmaMar, and Roche. SB is an employee of GSK. JH and EI are former employees of GSK. JB reports honoraria from Olympus; consulting or advisory role at AstraZeneca, Caris, Clovis, Genentech, and GSK; and speakers’ bureau at Clovis.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Mean change from baseline for EORTC QLQ-C30 QoL and Functional Scales. EORTC QLQ-C30, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C30; QoL, quality of life.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Mean change from baseline for EORTC QLQ-C30 symptom scores. EORTC QLQ-C30, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C30.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Mean change from baseline for EORTC QLQ-C30 single-item scores. EORTC QLQ-C30, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C30.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Cumulative distribution function of change in EORTC QLQ-C30 scores from baseline by RECIST overall response. The percent change from baseline for EORTC scores of patients experiencing one of three categories of RECIST (moderate improvement, no change, and moderate worsening). Median percentage of patients experiencing an improvement in change from baseline for EORTC score per RECIST category is indicated on each panel. EORTC QLQ-C30, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C30; RECIST, Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors.

References

    1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, et al. Cancer statistics, 2021. CA Cancer J Clin 2021;71:7–33. 10.3322/caac.21654 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mittica G, Ghisoni E, Giannone G, et al. Checkpoint inhibitors in endometrial cancer: preclinical rationale and clinical activity. Oncotarget 2017;8:90532–44. 10.18632/oncotarget.20042 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Boll D, Karim-Kos HE, Verhoeven RHA, et al. Increased incidence and improved survival in endometrioid endometrial cancer diagnosed since 1989 in the Netherlands: a population based study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2013;166:209–14. 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.10.028 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Muggia FM, Blessing JA, Sorosky J, et al. Phase II trial of the pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in previously treated metastatic endometrial cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol 2002;20:2360–4. 10.1200/JCO.2002.08.171 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fracasso PM, Blessing JA, Molpus KL, et al. Phase II study of oxaliplatin as second-line chemotherapy in endometrial carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol 2006;103:523–6. 10.1016/j.ygyno.2006.03.043 - DOI - PubMed

Associated data