Readmission and In-Hospital Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Dementia
- PMID: 35973922
- PMCID: PMC10940024
- DOI: 10.1016/j.carrev.2022.08.016
Readmission and In-Hospital Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Dementia
Abstract
Background/purpose: The prevalence of dementia and aortic stenosis (AS) increases with each decade of age. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a definitive treatment for AS, but there are scarce data on morbidity, mortality, and readmission risk after TAVR in patients with dementia.
Methods/materials: We identified all admissions for TAVR in patients with AS in the National Readmissions Database in 2017-2018 and stratified them according to the presence or absence of a secondary diagnosis of dementia. Inpatient outcomes were compared using logistic regression. Cox proportional-hazards models were used to compare 30-, 60-, and 90-day readmissions.
Results: A total of 48,923 index hospitalizations for TAVR were identified, of which 2192 (4.5 %) had a secondary diagnosis of dementia. Presence of dementia was associated with higher odds of delirium, pacemaker placement, acute kidney injury, and fall in hospital. The hazard of 30-day readmission was not significantly different between patients with and without dementia, but patients with dementia experienced a higher hazard of 60-day readmission (HR 1.15, 95 % CI 1.03-1.26, p = 0.011) in the unadjusted model and higher hazard of 90-day readmission in both unadjusted (HR 1.18, 95 % CI 1.08-1.30, p < 0.001) and adjusted models (aHR 1.14, 95 % CI 1.04-1.25, p = 0.004).
Conclusions: Patients with dementia who undergo TAVR are at higher risk of in-hospital adverse outcomes and 60- and 90-day readmissions compared with patients without dementia. These estimates should be integrated into shared decision-making discussions with patients and families.
Keywords: Aortic stenosis; Dementia; Readmission; TAVI; TAVR.
Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Michael G. Nanna reports a relationship with American College of Cardiology Foundation that includes: funding grants. Michael G. Nanna reports a relationship with National Institutes of Health that includes: funding grants. John K. Forrest reports a relationship with Edwards Lifesciences Corporation that includes: consulting or advisory. John K. Forrest reports a relationship with Medtronic that includes: consulting or advisory.
Figures




References
-
- Nkomo VT, Gardin JM, Skelton TN, Gottdiener JS, Scott CG, Enriquez-Sarano M. Burden of valvular heart diseases: a population-based study. The Lancet. 2006 2006/September/16/;368(9540):1005–11. - PubMed
-
- Osnabrugge RLJ, Mylotte D, Head SJ, Van Mieghem NM, Nkomo VT, LeReun CM, et al. Aortic Stenosis in the Elderly: Disease Prevalence and Number of Candidates for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Meta-Analysis and Modeling Study. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2013 2013/September/10/;62(11):1002–12. - PubMed
-
- Eveborn GW, Schirmer H, Heggelund G, Lunde P, Rasmussen K. The evolving epidemiology of valvular aortic stenosis. The Tromsø Study. Heart. 2013 2013-March-15;99(6):396–400. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials