Periacetabular osteotomy after failed hip arthroscopy demonstrates improved outcomes in a heterogenous patient population: a systematic review
- PMID: 35974192
- DOI: 10.1007/s00167-022-07108-x
Periacetabular osteotomy after failed hip arthroscopy demonstrates improved outcomes in a heterogenous patient population: a systematic review
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the literature on patients undergoing periacetabular osteotomy after failed hip arthroscopy (PAO-FHA) for (1) patient demographics and hip morphology, (2) changes in preoperative to postoperative patient-reported outcomes (PROs), and (3) PROs in comparison to primary periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) patients.
Methods: A systematic literature search of Pubmed, CINAHL/Medline, and cochrane databases was performed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. The search phrase was "(periacetabular osteotomy or PAO or rotational osteotomy) and (hip arthroscopy or arthroscopic)". The titles, abstracts, and full texts were screened for studies on PAO-FHA. Study quality was assessed, and relevant data were collected. A meta-analysis was not performed due to study heterogeneity.
Results: The search identified 7 studies, including 151 hips (148 patients, 93.9% female) undergoing PAO-FHA, out of an initial 593 studies, with three Level IV and four Level III studies. Mean time from hip arthroscopy to PAO ranged from 17.0 to 29.6 months. Heterogenous hip morphologies and radiologic findings prior to PAO were observed, though patients most frequently demonstrated moderate-to-severe dysplasia (mean or median lateral center edge angle < 20°) and minimal osteoarthritis (Tönnis grade 0 or 1). In all 5 studies that reported concomitant procedures with PAO, femoral and/or acetabular osteoplasty was performed via arthroscopy or arthrotomy. Following PAO-FHA, radiographic acetabular coverage and PROs improved in all 6 studies that reported postoperative outcomes. All four comparative studies of primary PAO vs. PAO-FHA included patients with mean or median LCEAs < 20°, reporting mixed outcomes for the optimal treatment approach.
Conclusion: PAO-FHA is reported in a heterogenous patient population that frequently includes hips with moderate-to-severe dysplasia and minimal osteoarthritis. Regardless of hip morphology or concomitant procedures, all studies that reported postoperative outcomes demonstrated improved PROs following PAO-FHA.
Level of evidence: Level IV.
Keywords: Dysplasia; Femoroacetabular impingement; Hip arthroscopy; Hip/pelvis/thigh; Instability; Periacetabular osteotomy.
© 2022. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery, Arthroscopy (ESSKA).
Similar articles
-
Periacetabular Osteotomy Improves Pain and Function in Patients With Lateral Center-edge Angle Between 18° and 25°, but Are These Hips Really Borderline Dysplastic?Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019 May;477(5):1145-1153. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000516. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019. PMID: 30272611 Free PMC article.
-
Do Radiographic Parameters of Dysplasia Improve to Normal Ranges After Bernese Periacetabular Osteotomy?Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Apr;475(4):1120-1127. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-5077-8. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017. PMID: 27646418 Free PMC article.
-
One-third of Hips After Periacetabular Osteotomy Survive 30 Years With Good Clinical Results, No Progression of Arthritis, or Conversion to THA.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Apr;475(4):1154-1168. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-5169-5. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017. PMID: 27905061 Free PMC article.
-
Surgical Outcomes in the Treatment of Concomitant Mild Acetabular Dysplasia and Femoroacetabular Impingement: A Systematic Review.Arthroscopy. 2020 Apr;36(4):1176-1184. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.11.122. Epub 2019 Dec 4. Arthroscopy. 2020. PMID: 31809799
-
Patient-Reported Outcomes After Periacetabular Osteotomy Versus Hip Arthroscopy for Borderline Acetabular Dysplasia Are Both Favorable: A Systematic Review.Arthroscopy. 2025 Aug;41(8):3079-3093.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2024.11.090. Epub 2024 Dec 11. Arthroscopy. 2025. PMID: 39672243
Cited by
-
Femoral rotational osteotomy for femoroacetabular impingement: A systematic review.J Orthop. 2023 Dec 22;50:139-148. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2023.12.015. eCollection 2024 Apr. J Orthop. 2023. PMID: 38283872 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Hip preservation surgery for borderline and frank dysplasia: an overview of systematic reviews.EFORT Open Rev. 2024 Dec 2;9(12):1144-1155. doi: 10.1530/EOR-23-0152. EFORT Open Rev. 2024. PMID: 39620562 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Periacetabular osteotomy with and without concomitant arthroscopy: a systematic review of evidence on post-operative activity levels and return to sport.J Hip Preserv Surg. 2023 Nov 29;11(2):98-112. doi: 10.1093/jhps/hnad043. eCollection 2024 Jul. J Hip Preserv Surg. 2023. PMID: 39070206 Free PMC article.
-
[Hip dysplasia: What influence do age, arthrosis and concomitant diseases have on the treatment result?].Orthopadie (Heidelb). 2023 Apr;52(4):282-292. doi: 10.1007/s00132-023-04354-w. Epub 2023 Mar 9. Orthopadie (Heidelb). 2023. PMID: 36894594 Review. German.
References
-
- Ankem HK, Diulus SC, Kyin C, Jimenez AE, Maldonado DR, Sabetian PW, Saks BR, Lall AC, Domb BG (2021) Favorable outcomes of revision hip arthroscopy irrespective of whether index surgery was performed by the same surgeon or a different surgeon. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev 5(12):e21.00107. https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-21-00107 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous