JPEN Journal Club 72. The devil in the details
- PMID: 35975333
- DOI: 10.1002/jpen.2439
JPEN Journal Club 72. The devil in the details
Keywords: blinding; concealment of allocation; critical reading; early vs late nutrition support; generation of randomization sequence; methodologic bias; postoperative parenteral nutrition; sample size calculation; selective outcome reporting; supplementary information.
Comment on
-
Effect of Early vs Late Supplemental Parenteral Nutrition in Patients Undergoing Abdominal Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA Surg. 2022 May 1;157(5):384-393. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2022.0269. JAMA Surg. 2022. PMID: 35293973 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Gao X, Liu Y, Zhang L, et al. Effect of early vs late supplemental parenteral nutrition in patients undergoing abdominal surgery. A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surgery. 2022;(May 1) 157(5):384-393.
-
- Kondrup J, Allison SP, Elia M, Vellas B, Plauth M. ESPEN guidelines for nutrition screening 2002. Clin Nutr. 2003;(Aug) 22(4):415-421.
-
- Heidegger CP, Berger MM, Graf S, et al. Optimisation of energy provision with supplemental parenteral nutrition in critically ill patients: a randomised controlled clinical trial. Lancet. 2013;(Feb 2) 381(9864):385-393.
-
- Casaer MP, Mesotten D, Hermans G, et al. Early versus late parenteral nutrition in critically ill adults. N Engl J Med. 2011;(August 11) 365(6):506-517.
-
- Koretz RL. JPEN Journal Club 12. Selective outcome reporting. JPEN. 2015;(May) 39(4):489-491.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
