Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Sep 1;27(5):e410-e418.
doi: 10.4317/medoral.25177.

Can adjunctive corticosteroid therapy improve patient-centered outcomes following third molar surgery? A systematic review

P Parhizkar  1 , P-R Schmidlin, M-M Bornstein, O Fakheran
Affiliations

Can adjunctive corticosteroid therapy improve patient-centered outcomes following third molar surgery? A systematic review

P Parhizkar et al. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. .

Abstract

Background: Third molar surgery is frequently associated with postoperative discomfort such as pain, edema and trismus. We aimed to evaluate the current evidence on the efficacy of adjunctive corticosteroid therapy in improving patient-centered outcomes following third molar surgery.

Material and methods: This systematic review assessed and searched PubMed, Google scholar, Scopus, web of science, clinicaltrials.gov and Cochrane central for controlled trials, up to May 2021. The primary outcome measures were patient-centered outcomes such as quality of life following the use of adjunctive corticosteroid therapy in third molar removal. Only randomized controlled trials published in English language were included.

Results: A total of 355 studies were initially identified, and 12 studies were finally included. The results showed that both methylprednisolone and dexamethasone decreased postoperative side effects such as pain, trismus, and edema and consequently were improving patient reported outcomes. In this regard, none of the included papers reported any significant statistical difference between these two drugs (p > 0.05). The analysis regarding the route of administration for the corticosteroids showed that local and intravenous injection of dexamethasone had equivalent effects, and both methods showed better results as compared to simple oral administration.

Conclusions: Adjunctive use of corticosteroid drugs may improve patient-centered outcomes following third molar surgery. However, there is no significant difference between drugs and routs of administration. Comparing various administration routs, local submucosal injection of dexamethasone seems to be a straightforward, painless and cost-effective adjunctive therapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest The authors declare that they have no Conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA flow chart of selection process.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Susarla SM, Dodson TB. Risk factors for third molar extraction difficulty. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004;62:1363–71. - PubMed
    1. Coulthard P, Bailey E, Esposito M, Furness S, Renton TF, Worthington HV. Surgical techniques for the removal of mandibular wisdom teeth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;7:CD004345. - PubMed
    1. Sancho-Puchades M, Valmaseda-Castellón E, Berini-Aytés L, Gay-Escoda C. Quality of life following third molar removal under conscious sedation. Medicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal. 2012;17:e994. - PMC - PubMed
    1. de Jongh A, van Wijk AJ, Lindeboom JA. Psychological impact of third molar surgery: a 1-month prospective study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011;69:59–65. - PubMed
    1. Negreiros RM, Biazevic MGH, Jorge WA, Michel-Crosato E. Relationship between oral health-related quality of life and the position of the lower third molar: postoperative follow-up. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012;70:779–86. - PubMed

Publication types