Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comment
. 2021 Jun 17;2(6):e211048.
doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2021.1048. eCollection 2021 Jun.

Association Between Medicaid Prescription Drug Limits and Access to Medications and Health Care Use Among Young Adults With Disabilities

Affiliations
Comment

Association Between Medicaid Prescription Drug Limits and Access to Medications and Health Care Use Among Young Adults With Disabilities

Caroline K Geiger et al. JAMA Health Forum. .

Abstract

Importance: Prescription drugs are necessary for managing complex physical and mental health conditions for more than 10 million Medicaid beneficiaries with disabilities. However, some state Medicaid programs limit the number of prescription drugs that beneficiaries can obtain monthly, which may decrease access to essential medications.

Objective: To examine the association between exposure to the 3-drug limit at age 21 years in Arkansas and Texas and prescription drug and health care use among beneficiaries with disabilities enrolled in Medicaid.

Design setting and participants: In this cohort study of 28 046 young adults with disabilities, difference-in-differences analysis was performed using Medicaid Analytic eXtract claims data from January 1, 2007, to December 31, 2012. Analyses were completed December 1, 2020. The analyses included Medicaid beneficiaries with disabilities in Arkansas and Texas (ie, drug cap states) or 15 comparison states without drug cap policies who became age 21 years during the study period and were continuously enrolled in fee-for-service Medicaid in the year before and after that point.

Exposures: Exposure to the 3-drug prescription limit at age 21 years in 2 drug cap states.

Main outcomes and measures: Monthly total prescriptions and prescriptions for drugs to treat mental health conditions, total prescription drug spending, and inpatient and emergency department visits and spending in the 12 months before and after becoming age 21 years.

Results: Among 28 046 young adults with disabilities, 8214 (29.3%) resided in drug cap states and were subject to the 3-drug limit at age 21 years. Most individuals were male (drug cap states: 61.4%, comparison states: 60.6%), and the minority were White individuals (drug cap states: 36.7%, comparison states: 49.4%). More than one-half of individuals with disabilities were diagnosed with a mental health condition before age 21 years (drug cap states: 57.0%, comparison states: 60.0%). In the year before the analyzed individuals became aged 21 years, the mean (SD) number of prescriptions per beneficiary per month was 1.58 (2.16) in drug cap states vs 1.82 (1.91) in comparison states. The drug cap policy was associated with 19.6% (95% CI, -21.3% to -17.8%; P < .001) fewer monthly prescriptions and 16.5% (95% CI, -21.9% to -10.8%; P < .001) fewer prescriptions for drugs for mental health conditions but was not associated with total prescription drug spending. The drug cap policy was associated with 13.6% (95% CI, 1.9% to 26.6%; P = .02) more inpatient admissions.

Conclusions and relevance: In this cohort study of young adults with disabilities, drug cap policies were associated with lower rates of access to important medications and higher rates of hospitalization among individuals in states with drug cap policies vs those without these policies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Geiger reported being currently employed by Genentech. Dr Sommers reported receiving personal fees from Health Research & Educational Trust Stipend for the editor's position at Health Services Research, grants from Baylor Scott & White, personal fees from Massachusetts Medical Society honorarium for lecture, honorarium from Urban Institute for grant review, honorarium from AcademyHealth for grant review, honorarium from American Economics Journal for journal review, consulting fees from the Illinois Department of Healthcare and Family Services, and grants from the Commonwealth Fund and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation outside the submitted work; Dr Sommers is currently on leave from Harvard and serving in the US Department of Health and Human Services. However, this article was conceived and drafted while Dr Sommers was employed at the Harvard School of Public Health, and the findings and views in this article do not reflect the official views or policy of the US Department of Health and Human Services. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure.
Figure.. Monthly Prescriptions Before and After Exposure to the Drug Cap Policy at Age 21 Years
Data presented are for the mean total prescriptions and mean total prescriptions for drugs used to treat mental health conditions in each month in the year before and after becoming age 21 years for all individuals with disabilities in drug cap states (n = 8214) and comparison states (n = 19 832) as well as the subgroup of individuals with a serious mental illness in drug cap states (n = 1178) and comparison states (n = 2957). The vertical line represents the month of the 21st birthday when individuals were first exposed to the 3-drug limit in drug cap states. The drug cap policy was associated with a significant decrease in total prescriptions and prescriptions for drugs to treat mental health conditions among all individuals with disabilities as well as those with a serious mental illness.

Comment in

Comment on

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. MACPAC: Medicaid and CHIP Payment and Access Commission. People with disabilities. 2017. Accessed October 14, 2020. https://www.macpac.gov/subtopic/people-with-disabilities/
    1. Kronick RG, Bella M, Gilmer TP, et al. . The Faces of Medicaid III: Refining the Portrait of People With Multiple Chronic Conditions. Center for Health Care Strategies Inc; 2009:1-30.
    1. Bagchi A, Verdier J, Esposit D. Chartbook: Medicaid pharmacy benefit use and reimbursement in 2009. Mathematica Policy Research. December 12, 2012. Accessed February 1, 2019. https://www.mathematica.org/-/media/publications/pdfs/health/chartbook20...
    1. Soumerai SB. Benefits and risks of increasing restrictions on access to costly drugs in Medicaid. Health Aff (Millwood). 2004;23(1):135-146. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.23.1.135 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lieberman DA, Polinski JM, Choudhry NK, Avorn J, Fischer MA. Medicaid prescription limits: policy trends and comparative impact on utilization. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016;16(1):15. doi:10.1186/s12913-016-1258-0 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances