Development and Assessment of a New Framework for Disease Surveillance, Prediction, and Risk Adjustment: The Diagnostic Items Classification System
- PMID: 35977291
- PMCID: PMC8956982
- DOI: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.0276
Development and Assessment of a New Framework for Disease Surveillance, Prediction, and Risk Adjustment: The Diagnostic Items Classification System
Abstract
Importance: Current disease risk-adjustment formulas in the US rely on diagnostic classification frameworks that predate the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM).
Objective: To develop an ICD-10-CM-based classification framework for predicting diverse health care payment, quality, and performance outcomes.
Design setting and participants: Physician teams mapped all ICD-10-CM diagnoses into 3 types of diagnostic items (DXIs): main effect DXIs that specify diseases; modifiers, such as laterality, timing, and acuity; and scaled variables, such as body mass index, gestational age, and birth weight. Every diagnosis was mapped to at least 1 DXI. Stepwise and weighted least-squares estimation predicted cost and utilization outcomes, and their performance was compared with models built on (1) the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Clinical Classifications Software Refined (CCSR) categories, and (2) the Health and Human Services Hierarchical Condition Categories (HHS-HCC) used in the Affordable Care Act Marketplace. Each model's performance was validated using R 2, mean absolute error, the Cumming prediction measure, and comparisons of actual to predicted outcomes by spending percentiles and by diagnostic frequency. The IBM MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters Database, 2016 to 2018, was used, which included privately insured, full- or partial-year eligible enrollees aged 0 to 64 years in plans with medical, drug, and mental health/substance use coverage.
Main outcomes and measures: Fourteen concurrent outcomes were predicted: overall and plan-paid health care spending (top-coded and not top-coded); enrollee out-of-pocket spending; hospital days and admissions; emergency department visits; and spending for 6 types of services. The primary outcome was annual health care spending top-coded at $250 000.
Results: A total of 65 901 460 person-years were split into 90% estimation/10% validation samples (n = 6 604 259). In all, 3223 DXIs were created: 2435 main effects, 772 modifiers, and 16 scaled items. Stepwise regressions predicting annual health care spending (mean [SD], $5821 [$17 653]) selected 76% of the main effect DXIs with no evidence of overfitting. Validated R 2 was 0.589 in the DXI model, 0.539 for CCSR, and 0.428 for HHS-HCC. Use of DXIs reduced underpayment for enrollees with rare (1-in-a-million) diagnoses by 83% relative to HHS-HCCs.
Conclusions: In this diagnostic modeling study, the new DXI classification system showed improved predictions over existing diagnostic classification systems for all spending and utilization outcomes considered.
Copyright 2022 Ellis RP et al. JAMA Health Forum.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Drs Ellis and Ash wish to disclose that although they founded, owned shares of, worked for, and were compensated by the firm DxCG, Inc, which developed risk-adjustment models and software from 1996 to 2004, they sold that company in 2004, and neither researcher has done any work for or received any compensation from any subsequent owners of DxCG or any other risk model developer or consulting company in the past 3 years. No other disclosures were reported.
Figures


Similar articles
-
A Novel Machine Learning Algorithm for Creating Risk-Adjusted Payment Formulas.JAMA Health Forum. 2024 Apr 5;5(4):e240625. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.0625. JAMA Health Forum. 2024. PMID: 38639980 Free PMC article.
-
Diagnostic Category Prevalence in 3 Classification Systems Across the Transition to the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification.JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Apr 1;3(4):e202280. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.2280. JAMA Netw Open. 2020. PMID: 32267514 Free PMC article.
-
Plan Selection, Enrollee Risk, and Health Spending on the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act Individual Marketplaces, 2019.JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Mar 1;6(3):e234529. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.4529. JAMA Netw Open. 2023. PMID: 36995715 Free PMC article.
-
Association of Financial Integration Between Physicians and Hospitals With Commercial Health Care Prices.JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Dec;175(12):1932-9. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.4610. JAMA Intern Med. 2015. PMID: 26501217
-
The Primary Care Spend Model: a systems approach to measuring investment in primary care.BMJ Glob Health. 2019 Jul 10;4(4):e001601. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001601. eCollection 2019. BMJ Glob Health. 2019. PMID: 31354975 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
A Real-world Evaluation of Longitudinal Healthcare Expenses in a Health System Registry of Type-2 Diabetes Mellitus and Cardiovascular Disease Enabled by the 21st Century Cures Act.medRxiv [Preprint]. 2025 May 29:2025.05.28.25328527. doi: 10.1101/2025.05.28.25328527. medRxiv. 2025. PMID: 40492070 Free PMC article. Preprint.
-
Patterns of Morbidity Across the Lifespan: A Population Segmentation Framework for Classifying Health Care Needs for All Ages.Med Care. 2024 Nov 1;62(11):732-740. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001898. Epub 2023 Nov 7. Med Care. 2024. PMID: 37962403 Free PMC article.
-
A framework for ex-ante evaluation of the potential effects of risk equalization and risk sharing in health insurance markets with regulated competition.Health Econ Rev. 2024 Jul 24;14(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s13561-024-00540-4. Health Econ Rev. 2024. PMID: 39046547 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Comparison of diagnosis-based risk adjustment methods for episode-based costs to apply in efficiency measurement.BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Dec 1;23(1):1334. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10282-4. BMC Health Serv Res. 2023. PMID: 38041081 Free PMC article.
-
A Novel Machine Learning Algorithm for Creating Risk-Adjusted Payment Formulas.JAMA Health Forum. 2024 Apr 5;5(4):e240625. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.0625. JAMA Health Forum. 2024. PMID: 38639980 Free PMC article.
References
-
- US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics . International Classification of Diseases, (ICD-10-CM/PCS) transition – background. Accessed November 21, 2017. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/icd/icd10cm_pcs_background.htm
-
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP). Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ): Clinical Classifications Software Refined (CCSR) for ICD-10-CM. Accessed June 20, 2019. https://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/toolssoftware/ccsr/ccs_refined.jsp
-
- World Health Organization . International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems 10th Revision. Accessed June 20, 2019. https://icd.who.int/browse10/2016/en
-
- Hileman G. Modeling effects of enrollee choice. Society of Actuaries Health Care Cost Trends Committee. Accessed January 26, 2021. https://www.soa.org/globalassets/assets/files/resources/research-report/...