Time and Financial Costs for Physician Practices to Participate in the Medicare Merit-based Incentive Payment System: A Qualitative Study
- PMID: 35977308
- PMCID: PMC8796897
- DOI: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2021.0527
Time and Financial Costs for Physician Practices to Participate in the Medicare Merit-based Incentive Payment System: A Qualitative Study
Abstract
Importance: The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) is a major Medicare value-based purchasing program, influencing payment for more than 1 million clinicians annually. There is a growing concern that MIPS increases administrative burden, and little is known about what it costs physician practices to participate in the program.
Objective: To examine the costs for independent physician practices to participate in MIPS in 2019.
Design setting and participants: This qualitative study identified and interviewed leaders of physician practices participating in the US Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) MIPS program, including those in MIPS alternative payment models. Time required and financial costs were calculated from responses to in-depth, semistructured interviews conducted from December 12, 2019, to June 23, 2020. Physician practices were categorized by size (small, 1-9 physicians; medium, 10-25; and large, ≥50), specialty (primary care, general surgery, or multispecialty), and US census region. Participants were asked about 2019 costs related to clinician and staff time, information technology, and external vendors. Time was converted to financial costs using the Medical Group Management Association's Provider Compensation and the Management and Staff Compensation databases.
Main outcomes and measures: Annual time spent by staff on MIPS-related activities and mean per-physician costs to physician practices in 2019.
Results: Leaders of 30 physician practices (9 [30.0%] small primary care, 6 [20.0%] small general surgery, 4 [13.3%] medium primary care, 4 [13.3%] medium general surgery, and 7 [23.3%] large multispecialty) represented all US census regions, and 14 of the 30 (46.7%) practices participated in a MIPS alternative payment model in 2019. The mean per-physician cost to practices of participating in MIPS was $12 811 (interquartile range [IQR], $2861-$17 715). Physicians, clinical staff, and administrative staff together spent 201.7 (IQR, 50.9-295.2) hours annually per physician on MIPS-related activities. Medical assistants and nursing staff together spent a mean of 99.2 (IQR, 0-163.3) hours per physician each year; frontline physicians spent 53.6 (IQR, 0.6-55.8) hours; executive administrators spent 28.6 (IQR, 3.1-26.7) hours; other clinicians and staff spent a combined 20.3 (IQR, 0-36.8) hours. Physician time accounted for the greatest proportion of overall MIPS-related costs (54%; $6909; IQR, $94-$9905).
Conclusions and relevance: In this qualitative study, physician practice leaders reported significant time and financial costs of participating in the MIPS program. Attention to reducing the burden of MIPS may be warranted.
Copyright 2021 Khullar D et al. JAMA Health Forum.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Khullar reported grants from Arnold Ventures and the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute outside the submitted work. Dr Bond reported grants from Arnold Ventures outside the submitted work. Dr Casalino reported grants from the American Board of Family Medicine outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.
Figures

Comment in
-
Cost of Compliance With CMS Physician Quality Monitoring-Too High?JAMA Health Forum. 2021 May 6;2(5):e210684. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2021.0684. JAMA Health Forum. 2021. PMID: 36218675 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
How Did Orthopaedic Surgeons Perform in the 2018 Centers for Medicaid & Medicare Services Merit-based Incentive Payment System?Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022 Jan 1;480(1):8-22. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001981. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022. PMID: 34543249 Free PMC article.
-
Physician Practice Leaders' Perceptions of Medicare's Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS).J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Dec;36(12):3752-3758. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-06758-w. Epub 2021 Apr 9. J Gen Intern Med. 2021. PMID: 33835310 Free PMC article.
-
Emergency clinician participation and performance in the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Merit-based Incentive Payment System.Acad Emerg Med. 2022 Jan;29(1):64-72. doi: 10.1111/acem.14373. Epub 2021 Sep 7. Acad Emerg Med. 2022. PMID: 34375479 Free PMC article.
-
The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS): A Primer for Otolaryngologists.Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018 Sep;159(3):410-413. doi: 10.1177/0194599818774033. Epub 2018 May 8. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018. PMID: 29734874 Review.
-
MACRA 2.0: are you ready for MIPS?J Neurointerv Surg. 2017 Jul;9(7):714-716. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012845. Epub 2016 Nov 24. J Neurointerv Surg. 2017. PMID: 27884928 Review.
Cited by
-
Comparison of Performance of Psychiatrists vs Other Outpatient Physicians in the 2020 US Medicare Merit-Based Incentive Payment System.JAMA Health Forum. 2022 Mar 25;3(3):e220212. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.0212. eCollection 2022 Mar. JAMA Health Forum. 2022. PMID: 35977292 Free PMC article.
-
Association Between Urologist Merit-Based Incentive Payment System Performance and Quality of Prostate Cancer Care.Urol Pract. 2024 Jan;11(1):207-214. doi: 10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000463. Epub 2023 Sep 25. Urol Pract. 2024. PMID: 37748132 Free PMC article.
-
Electronic health record developer market segmentation contributes to divide in physician interoperable exchange.J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022 Jun 14;29(7):1200-1207. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocac056. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022. PMID: 35442438 Free PMC article.
-
How Did Orthopaedic Surgeons Perform in the 2018 Centers for Medicaid & Medicare Services Merit-based Incentive Payment System?Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022 Jan 1;480(1):8-22. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001981. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022. PMID: 34543249 Free PMC article.
-
Acquisition of Urology Practices by Private Equity Firms and Performance in the Merit-based Incentive Payment System.Urol Pract. 2023 Nov;10(6):597-603. doi: 10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000441. Epub 2023 Oct 19. Urol Pract. 2023. PMID: 37856709 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act. 42 USC §1305 (2015). Accessed April 14, 2021. https://uscode.house.gov/statviewer.htm?volume=129&page=87
-
- Navathe AS, Liao JM. MIPS APMs in the quality payment program. Health Affairs. Accessed July 31, 2020. https://www.healthaffairs.org/do/10.1377/hblog20181030.290056/full/ - DOI
-
- MDinterative . 2018 MIPS final scores and performance feedback now available. Accessed March 3, 2021. https://mdinteractive.com/mips-blog/2018-mips-final-scores-and-performan...
-
- Ballou J. MIPS rewards are too small, and that’s okay. Mathematica. Accessed March 3, 2021. https://www.mathematica.org/commentary/mips-rewards-are-too-small-and-th...
-
- US Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services . Alternative payment models (APMs) overview. Accessed March 3, 2021. https://qpp.cms.gov/apms/overview
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical