Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2022 Oct 25;99(17):e1926-e1944.
doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000201029. Epub 2022 Aug 17.

Disease Reactivation After Cessation of Disease-Modifying Therapy in Patients With Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis

Izanne Roos  1 Charles Malpas  1 Emmanuelle Leray  1 Romain Casey  1 Dana Horakova  1 Eva Kubala Havrdova  1 Marc Debouverie  1 Francesco Patti  1 Jerome De Seze  1 Guillermo Izquierdo  1 Sara Eichau  1 Gilles Edan  1 Alexandre Prat  1 Marc Girard  1 Serkan Ozakbas  1 Pierre Grammond  1 Helene Zephir  1 Jonathan Ciron  1 Elisabeth Maillart  1 Thibault Moreau  1 Maria Pia Amato  1 Pierre Labauge  1 Raed Alroughani  1 Katherine Buzzard  1 Olga Skibina  1 Murat Terzi  1 David Axel Laplaud  1 Eric Berger  1 Francois Grand'Maison  1 Christine Lebrun-Frenay  1 Elisabetta Cartechini  1 Cavit Boz  1 Jeannette Lechner-Scott  1 Pierre Clavelou  1 Bruno Stankoff  1 Julie Prevost  1 Ludwig Kappos  1 Jean Pelletier  1 Vahid Shaygannejad  1 Bassem I Yamout  1 Samia J Khoury  1 Oliver Gerlach  1 Daniele L A Spitaleri  1 Vincent Van Pesch  1 Olivier Gout  1 Recai Turkoglu  1 Olivier Heinzlef  1 Eric Thouvenot  1 Pamela Ann McCombe  1 Aysun Soysal  1 Bertrand Bourre  1 Mark Slee  1 Tamara Castillo-Trivino  1 Serge Bakchine  1 Radek Ampapa  1 Ernest Gerard Butler  1 Abir Wahab  1 Richard A Macdonell  1 Eduardo Aguera-Morales  1 Philippe Cabre  1 Nasr Haifa Ben  1 Anneke Van der Walt  1 Guy Laureys  1 Liesbeth Van Hijfte  1 Cristina M Ramo-Tello  1 Nicolas Maubeuge  1 Suzanne Hodgkinson  1 José Luis Sánchez-Menoyo  1 Michael H Barnett  1 Celine Labeyrie  1 Steve Vucic  1 Youssef Sidhom  1 Riadh Gouider  1 Tunde Csepany  1 Javier Sotoca  1 Koen de Gans  1 Abdullah Al-Asmi  1 Yara Dadalti Fragoso  1 Sandra Vukusic  1 Helmut Butzkueven  1 Tomas Kalincik  2 MSBase and OFSEP
Affiliations
Observational Study

Disease Reactivation After Cessation of Disease-Modifying Therapy in Patients With Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis

Izanne Roos et al. Neurology. .

Abstract

Background and objectives: To evaluate the rate of return of disease activity after cessation of multiple sclerosis (MS) disease-modifying therapy.

Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study from 2 large observational MS registries: MSBase and OFSEP. Patients with relapsing-remitting MS who had ceased a disease-modifying therapy and were followed up for the subsequent 12 months were included in the analysis. The primary study outcome was annualized relapse rate in the 12 months after disease-modifying therapy discontinuation stratified by patients who did, and did not, commence a subsequent therapy. The secondary endpoint was the predictors of first relapse and disability accumulation after treatment discontinuation.

Results: A total of 14,213 patients, with 18,029 eligible treatment discontinuation epochs, were identified for 7 therapies. Annualized rates of relapse (ARRs) started to increase 2 months after natalizumab cessation (month 2-4 ARR 0.47, 95% CI 0.43-0.51). Commencement of a subsequent therapy within 2-4 months reduced the magnitude of disease reactivation (mean ARR difference: 0.15, 0.08-0.22). After discontinuation of fingolimod, rates of relapse increased overall (month 1-2 ARR: 0.80, 0.70-0.89) and stabilized faster in patients who started a new therapy within 1-2 months (mean ARR difference: 0.14, -0.01 to 0.29). The magnitude of disease reactivation for other therapies was low but reduced further by commencement of another treatment 1-10 months after treatment discontinuation. Predictors of relapse were a higher relapse rate in the year before cessation, female sex, younger age, and higher EDSS score. Commencement of a subsequent therapy reduced both the risk of relapse (HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.72-0.81) and disability accumulation (0.73, 0.65-0.80).

Discussion: The rate of disease reactivation after treatment cessation differs among MS treatments, with the peaks of relapse activity ranging from 1 to 10 months in untreated cohorts that discontinued different therapies. These results suggest that untreated intervals should be minimized after stopping antitrafficking therapies (natalizumab and fingolimod).

Classification of evidence: This study provides Class III that disease reactivation occurs within months of discontinuation of MS disease-modifying therapies. The risk of disease activity is reduced by commencement of a subsequent therapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Consort Diagram of Patient Disposition
Patients excluded due to insufficient visit data did not have a baseline visit (with the EDSS score recorded) within an interval of 180 days before or 30 days after cessation of therapy or had fewer than 2 postbaseline visits >6 months apart. Insufficiently represented therapies are those with fewer than 200 recorded treatment discontinuation events (alemtuzumab: 101; cladribine: 36; daclizumab: 13; ocrelizumab: 3; and rituximab: 26). EDSS = Expanded Disability Status Scale; RRMS = relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Annualized Relapse Rate in the 12 Months Before Baseline (During Index Treatment) and After Treatment Cessation
Baseline (treatment cessation) is indicated by time point 0 and represents the last recorded date of medication administration. The period after treatment cessation is stratified by patients who remained untreated or have started a new treatment (for each 1- or 2-month period). The on-treatment period is indicated by the gray shaded area. Point and whiskers show the relapse rates in each epoch. Number of patients: patients who contribute some time to each period. Annualized relapse rates were calculated as the total number of relapses divided by the number of patient-years in each time period. The pretreatment relapse rate and 95% CI is indicated by the open circle and line. The relapse rate was calculated using up to 1 year of untreated time immediately before treatment start (number of patients with data available as indicated). The dashed black line is a visual reference of the mean relapse rate during the second year before treatment cessation, with the shaded area indicating 95% CIs. Only treated time was included. Number of contributing patients: mitoxantrone 211, natalizumab 2,558, fingolimod 1,229, dimethyl fumarate 552, teriflunomide 388, interferon 9,931, and glatiramer acetate 2,999.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Annualized Relapse Rate in the 12 Months Before Baseline (During Index Treatment) and After Treatment Cessation in Patients Without Relapses in the Year Before Baseline
Baseline (treatment cessation) is indicated by time point 0 and represents the last recorded date of medication administration. The period after treatment cessation is stratified by patients who remained untreated or have started a new treatment (for each 1- or 2-month period). The on-treatment period is indicated by the gray shaded area. Point and whiskers show the relapse rates in each epoch. Number of patients: patients who contribute some time to each period. The pretreatment relapse rate and 95% CI is indicated by the open circle and line. The relapse rate was calculated using up to 1 year of untreated time immediately before treatment start. The dashed black line is a visual reference of the mean relapse rate during the second year before treatment cessation, with the shaded area indicating 95% CIs. Only treated time was included.

Similar articles

Cited by

  • Chemokine-mediated cell migration into the central nervous system in progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy.
    Deffner M, Schneider-Hohendorf T, Schulte-Mecklenbeck A, Falk S, Lu IN, Ostkamp P, Müller-Miny L, Schumann EM, Goelz S, Cahir-McFarland E, Thakur KT, De Jager PL, Klotz L, Meyer Zu Hörste G, Gross CC, Wiendl H, Grauer OM, Schwab N. Deffner M, et al. Cell Rep Med. 2024 Jul 16;5(7):101622. doi: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2024.101622. Epub 2024 Jun 24. Cell Rep Med. 2024. PMID: 38917802 Free PMC article.
  • De-escalating and discontinuing disease-modifying therapies in multiple sclerosis.
    Androdias G, Lünemann JD, Maillart E, Amato MP, Audoin B, Bruijstens AL, Bsteh G, Butzkueven H, Ciccarelli O, Cobo-Calvo A, Derfuss T, Di Pauli F, Edan G, Enzinger C, Geraldes R, Granziera C, Hacohen Y, Hartung HP, Hynes S, Inglese M, Kappos L, Kuusisto H, Langer-Gould A, Magyari M, Marignier R, Montalban X, Mycko MP, Nourbakhsh B, Oh J, Oreja-Guevara C, Piehl F, Prosperini L, Sastre-Garriga J, Sellebjerg F, Selmaj K, Siva A, Tallantyre E, van Pesch V, Vukusic S, Weinstock-Guttman B, Zipp F, Tintoré M, Iacobaeus E, Stankoff B. Androdias G, et al. Brain. 2025 May 13;148(5):1459-1478. doi: 10.1093/brain/awae409. Brain. 2025. PMID: 39707906 Free PMC article. Review.
  • Patient-centered pregnancy planning in multiple sclerosis: evidence for a new era.
    Melo EMV, Rodrigues BCA, Cabral FT, Villarim LAMT, Mendes MF. Melo EMV, et al. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2024 Oct;82(10):1-11. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1791202. Epub 2024 Oct 2. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2024. PMID: 39357853 Free PMC article. Review.
  • Escalation Versus Induction/High-Efficacy Treatment Strategies for Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis: Which is Best for Patients?
    Edan G, Le Page E. Edan G, et al. Drugs. 2023 Oct;83(15):1351-1363. doi: 10.1007/s40265-023-01942-0. Epub 2023 Sep 19. Drugs. 2023. PMID: 37725259 Free PMC article.
  • Comparative Effectiveness of Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant vs Fingolimod, Natalizumab, and Ocrelizumab in Highly Active Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis.
    Kalincik T, Sharmin S, Roos I, Freedman MS, Atkins H, Burman J, Massey J, Sutton I, Withers B, Macdonell R, Grigg A, Torkildsen Ø, Bo L, Lehmann AK, Havrdova EK, Krasulova E, Trnený M, Kozak T, van der Walt A, Butzkueven H, McCombe P, Skibina O, Lechner-Scott J, Willekens B, Cartechini E, Ozakbas S, Alroughani R, Kuhle J, Patti F, Duquette P, Lugaresi A, Khoury SJ, Slee M, Turkoglu R, Hodgkinson S, John N, Maimone D, Sa MJ, van Pesch V, Gerlach O, Laureys G, Van Hijfte L, Karabudak R, Spitaleri D, Csepany T, Gouider R, Castillo-Triviño T, Taylor B, Sharrack B, Snowden JA; MSBase Study Group Collaborators; MSBase Study Group Authors; Mrabet S, Garber J, Sanchez-Menoyo JL, Aguera-Morales E, Blanco Y, Al-Asmi A, Weinstock-Guttman B, Fragoso Y, de Gans K, Kermode A; MSBase Study Group. Kalincik T, et al. JAMA Neurol. 2023 Jul 1;80(7):702-713. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2023.1184. JAMA Neurol. 2023. PMID: 37437240 Free PMC article.

References

    1. Kalincik T, Kubala Havrdova E, Horakova D, et al. . Comparison of fingolimod, dimethyl fumarate and teriflunomide for multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2019;90(4):458-468. - PubMed
    1. Warrender-Sparkes M, Spelman T, Izquierdo G, et al. , MSBase Study Group. The effect of oral immunomodulatory therapy on treatment uptake and persistence in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2016;22(4):520-532. - PubMed
    1. Hartung HP, Gonsette R, Konig N, et al. , Mitoxantrone in Multiple Sclerosis Study Group MIMS. Mitoxantrone in progressive multiple sclerosis: a placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomised, multicentre trial. Lancet. 2002;360(9350):2018-2025. - PubMed
    1. Sorensen PS, Bertolotto A, Edan G, et al. . Risk stratification for progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy in patients treated with natalizumab. Mult Scler. 2012;18(2):143-152. - PubMed
    1. Berkovich R. Clinical and MRI outcomes after stopping or switching disease-modifying therapy in stable MS patients: a case series report. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2017;17:123-127. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms