Procedural Efficiency, Efficacy, and Safety of High-Power, Short-Duration Radiofrequency Ablation Delivered by STSF Catheter for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation
- PMID: 35979002
- PMCID: PMC9377865
- DOI: 10.1155/2022/6009275
Procedural Efficiency, Efficacy, and Safety of High-Power, Short-Duration Radiofrequency Ablation Delivered by STSF Catheter for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation
Abstract
Objectives: To investigate the procedural efficiency, efficacy, and safety of high-power, short-term radiofrequency ablation delivered by the SmartTouch Surround Flow (STSF) catheter for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF).
Methods: We retrospectively analyzed a total of 72 patients who were admitted with paroxysmal AF, and who underwent radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) for the first time. Of these patients, 36 cases underwent low-power, long-duration (LPLD, (30-35 W/20-40 s) pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) delivered by an SmartTouch (ST) catheter (control group), and the other 36 cases underwent high-power, short-duration (HPSD, (45-50 W/10-20 s) PVI delivered by a STSF catheter (study group). The baseline data, duration of PVI, procedural time, fluoroscopy time, the rate of first-pass isolation, irrigation perfusion, eschar and steam pop occurrences, intraoperative complications, and the rate of stable sinus rhythm maintenance following a blanking period of three months were analyzed between the two groups.
Results: The isolation time of bilateral PVI and procedural time in the study group were markedly less than in controls (p < 0.01). The rate of first-pass isolation in the study group was significantly higher than in the control group (95.8% vs. 84.7%, p = 0.023), while the fluid perfusion in the study group was approximately 20% less than that in the control group (767 ± 171 vs. 966 ± 227 ml, p < 0.001). We observed no severe complications in any patients. The rate of freedom from AF recurrences following a blanking period of three months showed a tendency to be higher than in controls (93.9% vs. 87.1%, p = 0.348).
Conclusions: The HPSD strategy delivered by the STSF catheter was superior to conventional LPLD ablation through the ST catheter with respect to efficiency, acute procedural effectiveness, short-term safety, and the risk of heart failure in patients with paroxysmal AF.
Copyright © 2022 Cheng Cheng et al.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
The Feasibility, Safety and Outcome of Very High-Power Short Duration Radiofrequency Ablation in Pulmonary Vein Isolation: A Real-World Observation Study.Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Jul 5;25(7):250. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2507250. eCollection 2024 Jul. Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024. PMID: 39139441 Free PMC article.
-
50-W vs 40-W During High-Power Short-Duration Ablation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: A Multicenter Prospective Study.JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2023 Dec;9(12):2573-2583. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2023.08.005. Epub 2023 Oct 4. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2023. PMID: 37804258
-
Impact of high-power short-duration atrial fibrillation ablation technique on the incidence of silent cerebral embolism: a prospective randomized controlled study.BMC Med. 2023 Nov 23;21(1):461. doi: 10.1186/s12916-023-03180-3. BMC Med. 2023. PMID: 37996906 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Comparisons of procedural characteristics and clinical outcomes between SMARTTOUCH SURROUNDFLOW catheter and other catheters for atrial fibrillation radiofrequency catheter ablation: a systematic literature review.BMJ Open. 2023 Oct 17;13(10):e075579. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075579. BMJ Open. 2023. PMID: 37848300 Free PMC article.
-
Meta-analysis of high power short duration in atrial fibrillation ablation - a superior efficient ablation strategy.Acta Cardiol. 2022 Feb;77(1):14-32. doi: 10.1080/00015385.2021.1939512. Epub 2021 Jul 5. Acta Cardiol. 2022. PMID: 34218737 Review.
Cited by
-
Comparative Efficacy and Safety Profiles of High-power, Short-duration and Low-power, Long-duration Radiofrequency Ablation in Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.J Innov Card Rhythm Manag. 2023 Jul 15;14(7):5514-5527. doi: 10.19102/icrm.2023.14072. eCollection 2023 Jul. J Innov Card Rhythm Manag. 2023. PMID: 37492695 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- January C. T., Wann L. S., Calkins H., et al. 2019 aha/acc/hrs focused update of the 2014 aha/acc/hrs guideline for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: a report of the american college of cardiology/american heart association task force on clinical practice guidelines and the heart rhythm society in collaboration with the society of thoracic surgeons. Circulation . 2019;140(2):e125–e151. doi: 10.1161/cir.0000000000000665. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Waranugraha Y., Rizal A., Firdaus A. J., et al. The superiority of high-power short-duration radiofrequency catheter ablation strategy for atrial fibrillation treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis study. Journal of Arrhythmia . 2021;37(4):975–989. doi: 10.1002/joa3.12590. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources