Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Aug 8:2022:7983530.
doi: 10.1155/2022/7983530. eCollection 2022.

Study on the Diagnostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Prostate Cancer

Affiliations

Study on the Diagnostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Prostate Cancer

Xinnian Pang et al. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. .

Abstract

Objective: The aim is to study the different roles of single and joint application of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in prostate malignant tumors.

Methods: 72 patients with prostate masses who underwent CEUS and MRI examination in our hospital from October 2021 and March 2022 were enrolled in this research. The differentially diagnostic roles of CEUS, MRI, and CEUS combined MRI for prostate cancer was assessed on basis of pathological findings as the reference standard. The specificity and sensitivity of the joint application for prostate malignant tumors with various prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels were also evaluated.

Results: The sensitivity of CEUS, MRI, and the joint application for prostate cancer were 72.1%, 74.4%, and 90.7%, respectively. Compared with single application, the sensitivity of CEUS combined with MRI was significantly higher. The specificity of MRI, CEUS, and the combination of the two for prostate cancer were 82.8%, 79.3%, and 89.7%, respectively, and the statistical differences for specificity were not found. The area under ROC curve (AUC) of CEUS combined with MRI in prostate malignant tumor diagnosis was obviously more than that of CEUS and MRI (P < 0.05). CEUS combined with MRI has relative high sensitivity in these patients with different levels of PSA.

Conclusions: Contrast-enhanced ultrasound combined with MRI can significantly improve the sensitivity and specificity of prostate cancer diagnosis so that patients can be better diagnosed in advance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
ROC curve of different examination methods for diagnosis of prostate cancer.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Chen Z., Chen X., Wang R. Application of SPECT and PET/CT with computer-aided diagnosis in bone metastasis of prostate cancer: a review. Cancer Imaging . 2022;22(1) - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nitusca D., Marcu A., Seclaman E., et al. Diagnostic value of microRNA-375 as future biomarker for prostate cancer detection: a meta-analysis. Medicina . 2022;58(4):p. 529. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gurwin A., Kowalczyk K., Knecht-Gurwin K., et al. Alternatives for MRI in prostate cancer diagnostics-review of current ultrasound-based techniques. Cancers . 2022;14(8) doi: 10.3390/cancers14081859. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Beyer K., Moris L., Lardas M., et al. Diagnostic and prognostic factors in patients with prostate cancer: a systematic review. BMJ Open . 2022 Apr;12(4) doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058267.e058267 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lindert K. A., Kabalin J. N., Terris M. K. Bacteremia and bacteriuria after transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy. The Journal of Urology . 2000 Jul;164(1):76–80. doi: 10.1097/00005392-200007000-00019. - DOI - PubMed