Metagenomic next-generation sequencing for the diagnosis of pulmonary aspergillosis in non-neutropenic patients: a retrospective study

Abstract

This study aimed to obtain further in-depth information on the value of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) for diagnosing pulmonary aspergillosis in non-neutropenic patients. We did a retrospective study, in which 33 non-neutropenic patients were included, of which 12 were patients with pulmonary aspergillosis and 21 were diagnosed with non-pulmonary aspergillosis. Fungi and all other co-pathogens in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) (27 cases), blood (6 cases), and/or pleural fluid (1 case) samples were analyzed using mNGS. One of the patients submitted both BALF and blood samples. We analyzed the clinical characteristics, laboratory tests, and radiologic features of pulmonary aspergillosis patients and compared the diagnostic accuracy, including sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of mNGS with conventional etiological methods and serum (1,3)-β-D-glucan. We also explored the efficacy of mNGS in detecting mixed infections and co-pathogens. We further reviewed modifications of antimicrobial therapy for patients with pulmonary aspergillosis according to the mNGS results. Finally, we compared the detection of Aspergillus in BALF and blood samples from three patients using mNGS. In non-neutropenic patients, immunocompromised conditions of non-pulmonary aspergillosis were far less prevalent than in patients with pulmonary aspergillosis. More patients with pulmonary aspergillosis received long-term systemic corticosteroids (50% vs. 14.3%, p < 0.05). Additionally, mNGS managed to reach a sensitivity of 91.7% for diagnosing pulmonary aspergillosis, which was significantly higher than that of conventional etiological methods (33.3%) and serum (1,3)-β-D-glucan (33.3%). In addition, mNGS showed superior performance in discovering co-pathogens (84.6%) of pulmonary aspergillosis; bacteria, bacteria-fungi, and bacteria-PJP-virus were most commonly observed in non-neutropenic patients. Moreover, mNGS results can help guide effective treatments. According to the mNGS results, antimicrobial therapy was altered in 91.7% of patients with pulmonary aspergillosis. The diagnosis of Aspergillus detected in blood samples, which can be used as a supplement to BALF samples, seemed to show a higher specificity than that in BALF samples. mNGS is a useful and effective method for the diagnosis of pulmonary aspergillosis in non-neutropenic patients, detection of co-pathogens, and adjustment of antimicrobial treatment.

Keywords: aspergillus; diagnosis; metagenomic next-generation sequencing; non-neutropenic patients; pulmonary aspergillosis.

Figure 1

Chest CT scan and bronchoscopy of pulmonary aspergillosis in non-neutropenic patient. (A) Chest CT showed cavitation signs; (B) Bronchoscopy showed purulent secretions, mucosal hyperemia, and edema.

Figure 2

Mixed infections and co-pathogens in 13 non-neutropenic pulmonary aspergillosis cases identified using mNGS. (A) Number of pulmonary aspergillosis patients with mixed infections; (B) Number of pulmonary aspergillosis patients infected with various co-pathogens.