Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jul 6;10(19):6370-6384.
doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i19.6370.

Pregnancy-related psychopathology: A comparison between pre-COVID-19 and COVID-19-related social restriction periods

Daniela Chieffo  1 , Carla Avallone  2 , Annamaria Serio  1 , Georgios Demetrios Kotzalidis  3 , Marta Balocchi  1 , Ilaria De Luca  2 , Daniele Hirsch  2 , Angela Gonsalez Del Castillo  2 , Pierluigi Lanzotti  2 , Giuseppe Marano  2 , Lucio Rinaldi  2 , Antonio Lanzone  4 , Eugenio Mercuri  5 , Marianna Mazza  6 , Gabriele Sani  2
Affiliations

Pregnancy-related psychopathology: A comparison between pre-COVID-19 and COVID-19-related social restriction periods

Daniela Chieffo et al. World J Clin Cases. .

Abstract

Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic impacted in a still undefined way pregnant women's mental health. There are reports of mood and affect changes in the general population and the suggestion that similar changes occur also in the pregnant population. The greater vulnerability of women during the COVID-19 restriction period may translate into a greater risk for mental disorders in the gestational period. We hypothesised that pregnant women in the pre-pandemic period would have less psychopathology and more psychological support than pregnant women during the pandemic restriction period.

Aim: To compare pregnant women for anxiety, prenatal depression, psychopathology, and social support before and after the awareness of the pandemic.

Methods: We administered to women willing to participate in their 2nd-3rd trimesters of pregnancy the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS), the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory Form Y (STAI-Y), and the Symptom CheckList-90-Revised (SCL-90R); we further collected sociodemographic variables and explored women's social support. The comparison was cross-sectional. The first sample was termed nonCOVID-19 because data were gathered before the COVID-19 outbreak (January 2020-February 2020) was declared, and the second sample termed COVID-19 because participants were already subjected to the COVID-19-related restrictive measures (January 2021-February 2021). Since normal distribution was not met (Shapiro-Wilk test applied), we applied nonparametric Mann-Whitney's U-test to compare psychometric tests. Ethical standards were met.

Results: The nonCOVID-19 group reported higher support from partners only, while the COVID-19 group reported multiple support (χ 2 = 9.7181; P = 0.021); the nonCOVID-19 group scored higher than the COVID-19 group only on state anxiety among psychometric scales [STAI-Y1, nonCOVID-19 median = 39 (95%CI: 39.19-51.10) vs COVID-19 median= 32 (95%CI: 30.83-38.90); Mann-Whitney's U=117.5, P = 0.00596]. Other measures did not differ meaningfully between the two groups. Scores on the EPDS, the state and trait subscales of the STAI-Y, and most SCL-90R subscales inter-correlated with one another. The anxiety component of the EPDS, EPDS-3A, correlated poorly with other measures, while it was the Global Symptom Index of the SCL-90-R that correlated most strongly with most measures. Our results are at odds with most literature and do not confirm increased depression and anxiety rates in pregnant women during the pandemic.

Conclusion: The ability of pregnant women to deal with novel generalised threats involves mobilization of inner resources. Increasing sources of social support may have produced anxiolysis in the COVID-19 sample.

Keywords: Anxiety; COVID-19 pandemic; Depression; Pregnancy; Psychopathology; Social Support.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict-of-interest statement: No author has any conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of study design. COVID-19: Coronavirus disease 2019; EPDS: Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Amerio A, Lugo A, Stival C, Fanucchi T, Gorini G, Pacifici R, Odone A, Serafini G, Gallus S. COVID-19 Lockdown impact on mental health in a large representative sample of Italian adults. J Affect Disord. 2021;292:398–404. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Al Dhaheri AS, Bataineh MF, Mohamad MN, Ajab A, Al Marzouqi A, Jarrar AH, Habib-Mourad C, Abu Jamous DO, Ali HI, Al Sabbah H, Hasan H, Stojanovska L, Hashim M, Abd Elhameed OA, Shaker Obaid RR, ElFeky S, Saleh ST, Osaili TM, Cheikh Ismail L. Impact of COVID-19 on mental health and quality of life: Is there any effect? PLoS One. 2021;16:e0249107. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chen YY, Wu KC, Gau SS. Mental health impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in Taiwan. J Formos Med Assoc. 2021;120:1421–1423. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Duan H, Yan L, Ding X, Gan Y, Kohn N, Wu J. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health in the general Chinese population: Changes, predictors and psychosocial correlates. Psychiatry Res. 2020;293:113396. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pierce M, Hope H, Ford T, Hatch S, Hotopf M, John A, Kontopantelis E, Webb R, Wessely S, McManus S, Abel KM. Mental health before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: a longitudinal probability sample survey of the UK population. Lancet Psychiatry. 2020;7:883–892. - PMC - PubMed