Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jul 21;8(3):e001287.
doi: 10.1136/bmjsem-2021-001287. eCollection 2022.

Applied sports science and sports medicine in women's rugby: systematic scoping review and Delphi study to establish future research priorities

Omar Heyward  1   2   3 , Stacey Emmonds  1   4 , Gregory Roe  1   5 , Sean Scantlebury  1   4 , Keith Stokes  2   6 , Ben Jones  1   3   4   7   8
Affiliations

Applied sports science and sports medicine in women's rugby: systematic scoping review and Delphi study to establish future research priorities

Omar Heyward et al. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. .

Abstract

Objectives: In part 1, the objective was to undertake a systematic scoping review of applied sports science and sports medicine in women's rugby, and in part 2 to develop a consensus statement on future research priorities.

Design: In part 1, a systematic search of PubMed (MEDLINE), Scopus and SPORTDiscus (EBSCOhost) was undertaken from the earliest records to January 2021. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020, the PRISMA extension for Scoping Reviews, and the PRISMA extension protocols were followed. In part 2, 31 international experts in women's rugby (ie, elite players, sports scientists, medical clinicians, sports administrators) participated in a three-round Delphi consensus method. These experts reviewed the findings from part 1 and subsequently provided a list of priority research topics in women's rugby. Research topics were grouped into expert-based themes and expert-based subthemes via content analysis. Expert-based themes and expert-based subthemes were ranked from very low to very high research priority on a 1-5 Likert scale. Consensus was defined by ≥70% agreement. The median research priority agreement and IQR were calculated for each expert-based theme and subtheme.

Data sources: PubMed (MEDLINE), Scopus and SPORTDiscus (EBSCOhost).

Eligibility criteria for selecting studies: Studies were eligible for inclusion if they investigated applied sports science or sports medicine in women's rugby.

Results: In part 1, the systematic scoping review identified 123 studies, which were categorised into six sports science and sports medicine evidence-based themes: injury (n=48), physical performance (n=32), match characteristics (n=26), fatigue and recovery (n=6), nutrition (n=6), and psychology (n=5). In part 2, the Delphi method resulted in three expert-based themes achieving consensus on future research priority in women's rugby: injury (5.0 (1.0)), female health (4.0 (1.0)) and physical performance (4.0 (1.0)).

Summary/conclusion: This two-part systematic scoping review and Delphi consensus is the first study to summarise the applied sports science and sports medicine evidence base in women's rugby and establish future research priorities. The summary tables from part 1 provide valuable reference information for researchers and practitioners. The three expert-based themes that achieved consensus in part 2 (injury, female health and physical performance) provide clear direction and guidance on future research priorities in women's rugby. The findings of this two-part study facilitate efficient and coordinated use of scientific resources towards high-priority research themes relevant to a wide range of stakeholders in women's rugby.

Keywords: female; rugby; sport; sports medicine; women.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow of articles from identification to inclusion.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Number of studies per sports science and sports medicine theme.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Number of studies per rugby code.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Quarrie KL, Handcock P, Waller AE, et al. The New Zealand rugby injury and performance project. III. anthropometric and physical performance characteristics of players. Br J Sports Med 1995;29:263–70. 10.1136/bjsm.29.4.263 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ball S, Halaki M, Orr R. Movement demands of rugby Sevens in men and women: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Strength Cond Res 2019;33:3475–90. 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003197 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gabbett T, King T, Jenkins D. Applied physiology of rugby League. Sports Med 2008;38:119–38. 10.2165/00007256-200838020-00003 - DOI - PubMed
    1. England Rugby . RFU Regulation 13 - Adult Competitions (Appendix 2); 2020.
    1. Owen C, Till K, Weakley J, et al. Testing methods and physical qualities of male age grade rugby union players: a systematic review. PLoS One 2020;15:e0233796. 10.1371/journal.pone.0233796 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources