Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Aug 15;18(3):649-664.
doi: 10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2020.0704.

Strategies to enhance monoclonal antibody uptake and distribution in solid tumors

Affiliations
Review

Strategies to enhance monoclonal antibody uptake and distribution in solid tumors

Brandon M Bordeau et al. Cancer Biol Med. .

Abstract

Despite the significant resources dedicated to the development of monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapies for solid tumors, the clinical success, thus far, has been modest. Limited efficacy of mAb in solid tumors likely relates to unique aspects of tumor physiology. Solid tumors have an aberrant vasculature and a dense extracellular matrix that slow both the convective and diffusive transport of mAbs into and within tumors. For mAbs that are directed against cellular antigens, high antigen expression and rapid antigen turnover can result in perivascular cells binding to and eliminating a significant amount of extravasated mAb, limiting mAb distribution to portions of the tumor that are distant from functional vessels. Many preclinical investigations have reported strategies to improve mAb uptake and distribution; however, to our knowledge, none have translated into the clinic. Here, we provide an overview of several barriers in solid tumors that limit mAb uptake and distribution and discuss approaches that have been utilized to overcome these barriers in preclinical studies.

Keywords: Solid tumors; antibody uptake and distribution; antibody–drug conjugate; monoclonal antibody.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Joseph P. Balthasar serves as a consultant for several pharmaceutical companies and as Director of the University at Buffalo Center for Protein Therapeutics, which is supported by an industry consortium.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Shown is a graphic representation of barriers that limit therapeutic antibody uptake and distribution into solid tumors and the approaches that have been reported to mitigate the tumor barriers. A graphic key is provided in the bottom left inset. Figure 1 was created using BioRender.com.

References

    1. Strebhardt K, Ullrich A. Paul Ehrlich’s magic bullet concept: 100 years of progress. Nat Rev Cancer. 2008;8:473–80. - PubMed
    1. Cruz E, Kayser V. Monoclonal antibody therapy of solid tumors: clinical limitations and novel strategies to enhance treatment efficacy. Biologics. 2019;13:33–51. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Maeda H, Khatami M. Analyses of repeated failures in cancer therapy for solid tumors: poor tumor-selective drug delivery, low therapeutic efficacy and unsustainable costs. Clin Trans Med. 2018;7:11. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Adler MJ, Dimitrov DS. Therapeutic antibodies against cancer. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 2012;26:447–81. vii. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tolcher AW. Antibody drug conjugates: lessons from 20 years of clinical experience. Ann Oncol. 2016;27:2168–72. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources