Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jun;51(3):547-556.
doi: 10.1111/cdoe.12781. Epub 2022 Aug 18.

Development and validation of an International Patient's Attitudes to Prevention in Oral Health Questionnaire

Julia Csikar  1 , Heather Leggett  1 , Karen Vinall-Collier  1 , Helen Whelton  2 , Susan Pavitt  1 , Jing Kang  1 , Gail V A Douglas  1
Affiliations
Free article

Development and validation of an International Patient's Attitudes to Prevention in Oral Health Questionnaire

Julia Csikar et al. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2023 Jun.
Free article

Abstract

Objectives: To develop a patient's attitude questionnaire regarding prevention in oral health for use internationally.

Methods: Using a mixed methods approach, a questionnaire was developed and refined as part of ADVOCATE (Added Value for Oral Care) study, involving partners in six countries: Netherlands, Hungary, Denmark, Ireland, Germany, and the UK. A literature review explored the history of oral healthcare delivery systems to develop a template for each of the six ADVOCATE countries. A systematic review identified the perceived barriers and facilitators to preventive oral healthcare and underpinned a topic guide and established the patient questionnaire domains. Focus groups in each ADVOCATE country developed the first version of the questionnaire. Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement (PPIE) in each ADVOCATE country tested the questionnaire and led to further refinement. The questionnaire was produced in five languages. Content validity and reproducibility used principal component analysis (PCA) and exploratory factor analysis (EFA) refined the questionnaire.

Results: The literature review aided an understanding of each country's oral healthcare system, and the findings from the 25 studies identified in the systematic review found the main barriers/facilitators to preventive oral healthcare were cost, knowledge (preventive treatments and advice), and a patient awareness and adherence to preventive advice/treatments. Interviews and focus groups with 148 participants in the ADVOCATE study identified receiving the appropriate level of care/feeling valued, cost, level of motivation/priority, not feeling informed, knowledge, and skill mix as the main barriers/facilitators. Fifty-three PPIE members refined the questionnaire. The pilot questionnaire was tested with 160 participants. Non-essential or highly correlated variables were then removed, leaving 38 items, covering 6 domains (cost, advice received, advice wanted, message delivery, motivation, knowledge, and responsibility) within the questionnaire. A second pilot test-run was undertaken with 185 participants. The test-re-test reliability demonstrated strong consistency of responses between the two time points (kappa range 0.3-0.7, most p < .0011), which culminated with a final version of the Patient Attitudes to Prevention in Oral Health Questionnaire (PAPOH) questionnaire.

Conclusions: This mixed-methods approach enabled the development of a multi-language attitudinal questionnaire for use with patients (PAPOH) to compare attitudes to oral disease prevention internationally.

Keywords: oral health; patient; questionnaire; restorative dentistry; validation.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Patrick D, Lee R, Nucci M, Grembowski D, Jolles C, Milgrom P. Reducing oral health disparities: a focus on social and cultural determinants. BMC Oral Health. 2006;6(1):1-17.
    1. Kassebaum N, Smith A, Bernabé E, et al. Global, regional, and national prevalence, incidence, and disability-adjusted life years for oral conditions for 195 countries, 1990-2015: a systematic analysis for the global burden of diseases, injuries, and risk factors. J Dent Res. 2017;96(4):380-387.
    1. Patel R. The state of oral health in Europe - Report commissioned by the platform for better Oral Health in Europe 2012. www.orlhealthplatform.eu. Accessed 01/04/19.
    1. Eaton K, Ramsdale M, Leggett H, et al. Variations in the provision and cost of oral healthcare in 11 European countries: a case study. Int Dent J. 2019;69(2):130-140.
    1. Braithwaite J. Changing how we think about healthcare improvement. BMJ. 2018;361:k2014.

Publication types