Cause-Effect Relationship of Varying Bonding Thicknesses in Dentin Adhesion of Universal Adhesives
- PMID: 35980238
- PMCID: PMC11734256
- DOI: 10.3290/j.jad.b3240695
Cause-Effect Relationship of Varying Bonding Thicknesses in Dentin Adhesion of Universal Adhesives
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate whether varying thicknesses of universal adhesives utilizing the additional coating strategy would affect their microtensile bond strength (µTBS) to dentin, hardness, and elastic modulus (mechanical properties).
Materials and methods: Ninety-nine human maxillary premolars were cut to expose coronal dentin, ground with regular-grit diamond burs, and randomly distributed into 9 groups based on 1. adhesive: Scotchbond Universal Adhesive (SB; universal), G Premio Bond (GP; universal) and Clearfil Megabond 2 (MB; two-step self-etch; control); and 2. application strategy (one, two or three coats; each coat light cured). After adhesive application and resin composite buildup, the bonded teeth were stored in distilled water (37°C; 24 h). Resin-dentin sticks from eight premolars per group (each premolar yielded 3 sticks; n = 24 sticks altogether) were prepared for the µTBS test, followed by measurement of the adhesive thicknesses at their fractured ends using SEM. The mechanical properties of the adhesive layers produced by different coats were evaluated on separate resin-dentin slices (n = 3 teeth per group).
Results: Two coats significantly increased the µTBS (p < 0.001) of all the adhesives. The correlation between adhesive thickness and bond strength was positive for GP but negative for SB. MB did not show any correlation. Additional coating significantly increased the mechanical properties of GP (p < 0.05) but did not affect SB and MB (p < 0.05).
Conclusion: An additional adhesive coating over the manufacturers' recommendations improved the bond strength of all the adhesives tested. However, the increased mechanical properties of the adhesives with additional curing was material dependent.
Keywords: additional coating; adhesive thickness; dentin; mechanical properties.; microtensile bond strength; universal adhesives.
Figures








Similar articles
-
Effects of Double Application of Contemporary Self-Etch Adhesives on Their Bonding Performance to Dentin with Clinically Relevant Smear Layers.J Adhes Dent. 2019;21(1):59-66. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a41986. J Adhes Dent. 2019. PMID: 30799472
-
Bonding Performance of Self-etching Adhesives to Bur-cut Dentin with Active Application Mode.J Adhes Dent. 2021 Jul 23;23(4):357-365. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.b1645379. J Adhes Dent. 2021. PMID: 34269546
-
Effect of Clinically Relevant Smear Layers and pH of Universal Adhesives on Dentin Bond Strength and Durability.J Adhes Dent. 2022 Mar 24;24:87-94. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.b2838121. J Adhes Dent. 2022. PMID: 35322946 Free PMC article.
-
Variable Smear Layer and Adhesive Application: The Pursuit of Clinical Relevance in Bond Strength Testing.Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Oct 29;20(21):5381. doi: 10.3390/ijms20215381. Int J Mol Sci. 2019. PMID: 31671751 Free PMC article.
-
[Curing mode of universal adhesives affects the bond strength of resin cements to dentin].Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2017 Feb 18;49(1):101-4. Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2017. PMID: 28203013 Chinese.
Cited by
-
Multi-acrylamides improve bond stability through collagen reinforcement under physiological conditions.Dent Mater. 2024 Jun;40(6):993-1001. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2024.05.002. Epub 2024 May 10. Dent Mater. 2024. PMID: 38729779 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of air-thinning a two-step adhesive layer on bond strength to tooth substrates.Odontology. 2025 Apr 9. doi: 10.1007/s10266-025-01098-1. Online ahead of print. Odontology. 2025. PMID: 40205243
-
Evaluating the advancements in a recently introduced universal adhesive compared to its predecessor.J Dent Sci. 2024 Jul;19(3):1609-1619. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2023.12.004. Epub 2023 Dec 19. J Dent Sci. 2024. PMID: 39035277 Free PMC article.
References
-
- 3M Oral Care 3MTM ScotchbondTM Universal Plus Adhesive Technical Product Profile [internet] 2020
-
- Ahmed MH, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Peumans M, Yoshihara K, Van Meerbeek B. Do universal adhesives benefit from an extra bonding layer. J Adhes Dent. 2019;21:117–132. - PubMed
-
- Alex G. Universal adhesives: the next evolution in adhesive dentistry. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2015;36:15–26. - PubMed
-
- Armstrong S, Breschi L, Özcan M, Pfefferkorn F, Ferrari M, Van Meerbeek B. Academy of Dental Materials guidance on in vitro testing of dental composite bonding effectiveness to dentin/enamel using micro-tensile bond strength (μTBS) approach. Dent Mater. 2017;33:133–143. - PubMed
-
- Atalay C, Ozgunaltay G, Yazici AR. Thirty-six-month clinical evaluation of different adhesive strategies of a universal adhesive. Clin Oral Investig. 2020;24:1569–1578. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous