Caregiver Perceptions Regarding Alternative Emergency Medical Services Dispositions for Children: A Cross-Sectional Survey Analysis
- PMID: 35980404
- PMCID: PMC9391016
- DOI: 10.5811/westjem.2022.5.55470
Caregiver Perceptions Regarding Alternative Emergency Medical Services Dispositions for Children: A Cross-Sectional Survey Analysis
Abstract
Introduction: Emergency medical services (EMS) systems have developed alternative disposition processes for patients (including leaving the patient at the scene, using taxis, and transporting to clinics) vs taking patients directly to an emergency department (ED). Studies show that patients favorably support these alternative options but have not included the perspectives of caregivers of children. Our objective was to describe caregivers' views about these alternative disposition processes and analyze whether caregiver support is associated with sociodemographic factors.
Methods: We surveyed a convenience sample of caregivers in a pediatric ED. We asked caregivers 15 questions based on a previously validated survey. We then conducted logistic regressions to determine whether sociodemographic factors were associated with levels of support.
Results: We enrolled 241 caregivers. The median age of their children was five years. The majority of respondents were non-Hispanic Black (57%) and had public insurance (65%). We found that a majority of respondents supported all alternative EMS disposition options. The overall level of agreement for survey questions ranged from 51-93%. We grouped questions by theme: non-transport; alternative destinations; communication with EMS physician; communication with primary care physician and sharing records; restricted EMS role; and shared decision-making. Regression analyses for each theme found that race/ethnicity, public insurance, and patient age were not significantly associated with the level of support.
Conclusion: Most caregivers were supportive of alternative EMS disposition options for children with low-acuity complaints. Support did not vary significantly by respondent race/ethnicity, public insurance status, or patient age.
Conflict of interest statement
Similar articles
-
Caregiver Perspectives on Including Children in Alternative Emergency Medical Services Disposition Programs: A Qualitative Study.Prehosp Emerg Care. 2024;28(2):262-270. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2023.2206480. Epub 2023 May 5. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2024. PMID: 37097974
-
Clinician and Caregiver Determinations of Acuity for Children Transported by Emergency Medical Services: A Prospective Observational Study.Ann Emerg Med. 2023 Mar;81(3):343-352. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2022.09.002. Epub 2022 Nov 3. Ann Emerg Med. 2023. PMID: 36334958 Free PMC article.
-
Patient Perspectives on EMS Alternate Destination Models.Prehosp Emerg Care. 2016 Nov-Dec;20(6):705-711. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2016.1182604. Epub 2016 May 27. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2016. PMID: 27232532
-
Prevalence of Low-Acuity Pediatric Emergency Medical Services Transports to a Pediatric Emergency Department in an Urban Area.Pediatr Emerg Care. 2024 May 1;40(5):347-352. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000003131. Epub 2024 Feb 13. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2024. PMID: 38355133 Free PMC article.
-
Emergency Medical Services Clinicians' Perspectives on Pediatric Non-Transport.Prehosp Emerg Care. 2023;27(8):993-1003. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2022.2108180. Epub 2022 Aug 29. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2023. PMID: 35913148
References
-
- Wang HE, Mann NC, Jacobson KE, et al. National characteristics of emergency medical services responses in the United States. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2013;17(1):8–14. - PubMed
-
- Patterson PD, Baxley EG, Probst JC, et al. Medically unnecessary emergency medical services (EMS) transports among children ages 0 to 17 years. Matern Child Health J. 2006;10(6):527–36. - PubMed