Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Dec;269(12):6544-6554.
doi: 10.1007/s00415-022-11319-0. Epub 2022 Aug 18.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of gene-based therapies for patients with spinal muscular atrophy type I in Australia

Affiliations

Cost-effectiveness analysis of gene-based therapies for patients with spinal muscular atrophy type I in Australia

Tianjiao Wang et al. J Neurol. 2022 Dec.

Abstract

Introduction: Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is an inherited neuromuscular disorder and regarded as one of the most frequent genetic causes of infant mortality. The aim of this study is to develop a cost-effectiveness analysis of AVXS-101 (Onasemnogene Abeparvovec/Zolgensma®) and nusinersen (Spinraza®) for SMA to inform decision-making on reimbursement policies in Australia.

Methods: A Markov model was developed with five health states to evaluate the costs and effects for patients with SMA Type I from a healthcare system perspective over a time-horizon of 100 years. The model parameters were based on clinical trials, parametric distributions, published literature, and Australian registries. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analysis were performed to appraise the uncertainties of the parameters in the model. A threshold analysis was conducted to estimate the cost of AVXS-101 of being cost-effective.

Results: The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of AVXS-101 was $1,808,471 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) and that of nusinersen was $2,772,798 per QALY, compared to standard of care, respectively. The ICER of AVXS-101 was $1,238,288 per QALY compared to nusinersen. The key drivers influencing on ICERs were costs of using treatments and utility values of sitting and walking independently.

Conclusion: Both nusinersen and AVXS-101 resulted in health benefits, but they were not cost-effective with a commonly used willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $50,000 per QALY. Developing high-quality clinical data and exploring appropriate WTP thresholds are critical for decision-making on reimbursement policies in the treatment of rare diseases.

Keywords: Cost-effectiveness analysis; Genetic therapy; Nusinersen; Onasemnogene abeparvovec; Rare disease; Spinal muscular atrophy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Structure of Markov model in the analysis
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Cost-effectiveness scatterplot of AVXS-101, nusinersen and SOC
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Cost-effectiveness acceptability curve of AVXS-101, nusinersen and SOC

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Archibald AD, Smith MJ, Burgess T, et al. Reproductive genetic carrier screening for cystic fibrosis, fragile X syndrome, and spinal muscular atrophy in Australia: outcomes of 12,000 tests. Genet Med. 2018;20(5):513–523. doi: 10.1038/gim.2017.134. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Verhaart IE, Robertson A, Wilson IJ, et al. Prevalence, incidence and carrier frequency of 5q–linked spinal muscular atrophy—a literature review. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2017;12(1):1–15. doi: 10.1186/s13023-017-0671-8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lunn MR, Wang CH. Spinal muscular atrophy. Lancet. 2008;371(9630):2120–2133. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60921-6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sugarman EA, Nagan N, Zhu H, et al. Pan-ethnic carrier screening and prenatal diagnosis for spinal muscular atrophy: clinical laboratory analysis of> 72 400 specimens. Eur J Hum Genet. 2012;20(1):27–32. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2011.134. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ogino S, Wilson RB. Spinal muscular atrophy: molecular genetics and diagnostics. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2004;4(1):15–29. doi: 10.1586/14737159.4.1.15. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms