Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Aug 18;8(8):e36861.
doi: 10.2196/36861.

Development and Validation of Indicators for Population Injury Surveillance in Hong Kong: Development and Usability Study

Affiliations
Review

Development and Validation of Indicators for Population Injury Surveillance in Hong Kong: Development and Usability Study

Keith T S Tung et al. JMIR Public Health Surveill. .

Abstract

Background: Injury is an increasingly pressing global health issue. An effective surveillance system is required to monitor the trends and burden of injuries.

Objective: This study aimed to identify a set of valid and context-specific injury indicators to facilitate the establishment of an injury surveillance program in Hong Kong.

Methods: This development of indicators adopted a multiphased modified Delphi research design. A literature search was conducted on academic databases using injury-related search terms in various combinations. A list of potential indicators was sent to a panel of experts from various backgrounds to rate the validity and context-specificity of these indicators. Local hospital data on the selected core indicators were used to examine their applicability in the context of Hong Kong.

Results: We reviewed 142 articles and identified 55 indicators, which were classified into 4 domains. On the basis of the ratings by the expert panel, 13 indicators were selected as core indicators because of their good validity and high relevance to the local context. Among these indicators, 10 were from the construct of health care service use, and 3 were from the construct of postdischarge outcomes. Regression analyses of local hospitalization data showed that the Hong Kong Safe Community certification status had no association with 5 core indicators (admission to intensive care unit, mortality rate, length of intensive care unit stay, need for a rehabilitation facility, and long-term behavioral and emotional outcomes), negative associations with 4 core indicators (operative intervention, infection rate, length of hospitalization, and disability-adjusted life years), and positive associations with the remaining 4 core indicators (attendance to accident and emergency department, discharge rate, suicide rate, and hospitalization rate after attending the accident and emergency department). These results confirmed the validity of the selected core indicators for the quantification of injury burden and evaluation of injury-related services, although some indicators may better measure the consequences of severe injuries.

Conclusions: This study developed a set of injury outcome indicators that would be useful for monitoring injury trends and burdens in Hong Kong.

Keywords: indicators; injury; modified Delphi research design; surveillance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of the scoping review.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Injuries and violence: the facts. World Health Organization. 2010. [2021-07-10]. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/44288/9789241599375_eng.... .
    1. Action plan to strengthen prevention of unintentional injuries in Hong Kong. Department of Health, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. 2014. [2021-07-13]. https://www.change4health.gov.hk/en/strategic_framework/structure/workin...
    1. Injury survey 2008. Surveillance and Epidemiology Branch Centre for Health Protection, Department of Health, Hong Kong Special Adminstrative Region. 2010. Sep, [2021-07-13]. https://www.chp.gov.hk/files/pdf/injury_survey_eng.pdf .
    1. Hotz G, Kennedy A, Lutfi K, Cohn S. Preventing pediatric pedestrian injuries. J Trauma. 2009 May;66(5):1492–9. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31819d9c9b.00005373-200905000-00041 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Theurer WM, Bhavsar AK. Prevention of unintentional childhood injury. Am Fam Physician. 2013 May 01;87(7):502–9. https://www.aafp.org/link_out?pmid=23547592 d10479 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources