Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022;56(3):215-225.
doi: 10.1159/000526530. Epub 2022 Aug 18.

Effects of Surface Prereacted Glass on Saliva-Derived Polymicrobial Biofilms in an Active Attachment Biofilm Model

Affiliations

Effects of Surface Prereacted Glass on Saliva-Derived Polymicrobial Biofilms in an Active Attachment Biofilm Model

Rob A M Exterkate et al. Caries Res. 2022.

Abstract

Bioactive restorative materials are being developed to either influence the de/remineralization balance of the dental hard tissues locally or to release components that interact with the oral microbiota. Surface prereacted glass (S-PRG, Shofu, Japan) is a material that may influence both processes. S-PRG releases fluoride, which can interact with the de/remineralization process, and a range of other compounds that may influence the oral microbiota. In the current study, several experiments were performed to investigate the potential of S-PRG to influence both the growth and lactic acid production of saliva-derived polymicrobial biofilms. Biofilm formation was studied using the Amsterdam Active Attachment model. An eluate of the S-PRG particles was tested by adding it to the growth medium or by exposing the biofilms to it for 1 h. The effect of S-PRG particles was tested by adding the particles to the growth medium. The current experiments showed that the presence of S-PRG eluate in the medium influenced biofilm growth and lactic acid production even at low concentrations. The composition of the biofilms changed in the presence of S-PRG eluate, even at concentrations of S-PRG eluate at which biofilm viability was not affected. Treatment of developing biofilms with S-PRG eluate did neither show an effect on biofilm viability nor on lactic acid production. The addition of S-PRG particles to the growth medium resulted in both a lower biofilm viability and lower lactic acid production, indicating that the release of ions from the particles was fast enough to influence biofilm formation. From the current experiments, it can be concluded that S-PRG has the potential to influence biofilm growth, but the presence of the released ions during biofilm formation is required to show an effect.

Keywords: Antimicrobial agents; Biofilms; Microbiology; Next-generation sequencing; Surface prereacted glass.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Rob A.M. Exterkate and Wim Crielaard received funding from Shofu Inc. to perform the studies in this manuscript. Both authors have no personal relationship with Shofu Inc.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Effect of repeated treatment of developing biofilms with S-PRG eluent on biofilm viability (a) and lactic acid production (b) versus time points (h) of the treatments. Groups (n = 6) were not statistically different from each other.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Effect of presence of diluted S-PRG eluent during growth on biofilm viability (a) and lactic acid production (b). Bars show the average and standard deviation of the mean. Groups (n = 4) with the same letter are not statistically significantly different to each other.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Principal component analysis of the biofilm microbiota profiles formed in the presence of different amounts of S-PRG eluent. At 12.5% and 50% of S-PRG eluent, the composition was clearly different from the other groups (a). PCA with the lower S-PRG concentrations only shows the differences in these groups: also at lower levels (with no effect on biofilm viability), differences in composition can be observed (b).
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Effect of adding S-PRG particles to the growth medium on biofilm viability (a) and lactic acid production (b). Biofilm formation was started with different inoculation ratios of saliva versus growth medium. Bars show the average and standard deviation of the mean. Groups (n = 4) with the same letter are not statistically significant different.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Biofilm viability (a) and lactic acid production (b) of biofilms that were grown 24 h in the absence of S-PRG particles and subsequently 24 h in the presence of S-PRG particles. Biofilm formation was started at two different inoculation ratios (1:50 and 1:5,000). S-PRG particles (0.8 μm) were added after 24 h at two different ratios (1:50 and 1:250). Bars show the average and standard deviation of the mean. Groups (n = 4) with the same letters are not statistically significantly different.

References

    1. Amaechi BT, Key MC, Balu S, Okoye LO, Gakunga PT. Evaluation of the caries-preventive effect of toothpaste containing surface prereacted glass-ionomer filler. J Investig Clin Dent. 2017;8((4)):e12249. - PubMed
    1. Exterkate RAM, Crielaard W, Ten Cate JM. Different response to amine fluoride by Streptococcus mutans and polymicrobial biofilms in a novel high-throughput active attachment model. Caries Res. 2010;44((4)):372–379. - PubMed
    1. Fujimoto Y, Iwasa M, Murayama R, Miyazaki M, Nagafuji A, Nakatsuka T. Detection of ions released from S-PRG fillers and their modulation effect. Dental Mater J. 2010;29((4)):392–397. - PubMed
    1. Hahnel S, Wastl DS, Schneider-Feyrer S, Giessibl FJ, Brambilla E, Cazzaniga G, et al. Streptococcus mutans biofilm formation and release of fluoride from experimental resin-based composites depending on surface treatment and S-PRG filler particle fraction. J Adhes Dent. 2014;16((4)):313–321. - PubMed
    1. Hotta M, Morikawa T, Tamura D, Kusakabe S. Adherence of Streptococcus sanguinis and Streptococcus mutans to saliva-coated S-PRG resin blocks. Dent Mater J. 2014;33((2)):261–267. - PubMed

Publication types