Reaching to Sounds Improves Spatial Hearing in Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users
- PMID: 35982520
- DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001267
Reaching to Sounds Improves Spatial Hearing in Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users
Abstract
Objectives: We assessed if spatial hearing training improves sound localization in bilateral cochlear implant (BCI) users and whether its benefits can generalize to untrained sound localization tasks.
Design: In 20 BCI users, we assessed the effects of two training procedures (spatial versus nonspatial control training) on two different tasks performed before and after training (head-pointing to sound and audiovisual attention orienting). In the spatial training, participants identified sound position by reaching toward the sound sources with their hand. In the nonspatial training, comparable reaching movements served to identify sound amplitude modulations. A crossover randomized design allowed comparison of training procedures within the same participants. Spontaneous head movements while listening to the sounds were allowed and tracked to correlate them with localization performance.
Results: During spatial training, BCI users reduced their sound localization errors in azimuth and adapted their spontaneous head movements as a function of sound eccentricity. These effects generalized to the head-pointing sound localization task, as revealed by greater reduction of sound localization error in azimuth and more accurate first head-orienting response, as compared to the control nonspatial training. BCI users benefited from auditory spatial cues for orienting visual attention, but the spatial training did not enhance this multisensory attention ability.
Conclusions: Sound localization in BCI users improves with spatial reaching-to-sound training, with benefits to a nontrained sound localization task. These findings pave the way to novel rehabilitation procedures in clinical contexts.
Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
References
-
- Allen M. C., Nikolopoulos T. P., O’Donoghue G. M. (1998). Speech intelligibility in children after cochlear implantation. Am J Otol, 19, 742–746.
-
- Archer-Boyd A. W., Carlyon R. P. (2019). Simulations of the effect of unlinked cochlear-implant automatic gain control and head movement on interaural level differences. J Acoust Soc Am, 145, 1389.
-
- Archer-Boyd A. W., Carlyon R. P. (2021). Further simulations of the effect of cochlear-implant pre-processing and head movement on interaural level differences. J Acoust Soc Am, 150, 506.
-
- Aronoff J. M., Yoon Y. S., Freed D. J., Vermiglio A. J., Pal I., Soli S. D. (2010). The use of interaural time and level difference cues by bilateral cochlear implant users. J Acoust Soc Am, 127, EL87–EL92.
-
- Asp F., Mäki-Torkko E., Karltorp E., Harder H., Hergils L., Eskilsson G., Stenfelt S. (2012). Bilateral versus unilateral cochlear implants in children: Speech recognition, sound localization, and parental reports. Int J Audiol, 51, 817–832.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
