Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Oct 1;35(5):424-430.
doi: 10.1097/QCO.0000000000000879. Epub 2022 Aug 19.

Typhoid fever control in the 21st century: where are we now?

Affiliations
Review

Typhoid fever control in the 21st century: where are we now?

Megan E Carey et al. Curr Opin Infect Dis. .

Abstract

Purpose of review: Momentum for achieving widespread control of typhoid fever has been growing over the past decade. Typhoid conjugate vaccines represent a potentially effective tool to reduce the burden of disease in the foreseeable future and new data have recently emerged to better frame their use-case.

Recent findings: We describe how antibiotic resistance continues to pose a major challenge in the treatment of typhoid fever, as exemplified by the emergence of azithromycin resistance and the spread of Salmonella Typhi strains resistant to third-generation cephalosporins. We review efficacy and effectiveness data for TCVs, which have been shown to have high-level efficacy (≥80%) against typhoid fever in diverse field settings. Data from randomized controlled trials and observational studies of TCVs are reviewed herein. Finally, we review data from multicountry blood culture surveillance studies that have provided granular insights into typhoid fever epidemiology. These data are becoming increasingly important as countries decide how best to introduce TCVs into routine immunization schedules and determine the optimal delivery strategy.

Summary: Continued advocacy is needed to address the ongoing challenge of typhoid fever to improve child health and tackle the rising challenge of antimicrobial resistance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Gibani MM, Britto C, Pollard AJ. Typhoid and paratyphoid fever: a call to action. Curr Opin Infect Dis 2018; 31:440–448.
    1. Marchello CS, Hong CY, Crump JA. Global typhoid fever incidence: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis 2019; 68:S105.
    1. Stanaway JD, Parisi A, Sarkar K, et al. The global burden of nontyphoidal salmonella invasive disease: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet Infect Dis 2019; 19:1312–1324.
    1. Carey ME, MacWright WR, Im J, et al. The Surveillance for Enteric Fever in Asia Project (SEAP), Severe Typhoid Fever Surveillance in Africa (SETA), Surveillance of Enteric Fever in India (SEFI), and Strategic Typhoid Alliance Across Africa and Asia (STRATAA) Population-based Enteric Fever Studies: A Review of Methodological Similarities and Differences. Clin Infect Dis 2020; 71:S102.
    1. Meiring JE, Shakya M, Khanam F, et al. Burden of enteric fever at three urban sites in Africa and Asia: a multicentre population-based study. Lancet Glob Heal 2021; 9:e1688–e1696.

Publication types