The authors reply
- PMID: 35984065
- DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005601
The authors reply
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have disclosed that they do not have any potential conflicts of interest.
Comment on
-
Controversial Efficacy of Prone-Positioning for Patients With Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Undergoing Venous-Venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.Crit Care Med. 2022 Sep 1;50(9):e725-e726. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005575. Epub 2022 Aug 15. Crit Care Med. 2022. PMID: 35984064 No abstract available.
References
-
- Inagawa T, Ohshimo S, Shime N: Controversial Efficacy of Prone-Positioning for Patients With Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Undergoing Venous-Venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation. Crit Care Med 2022; 50:e725–e726
-
- Petit M, Fetita C, Gaudemer A, et al.: Prone-positioning for severe acute respiratory distress syndrome requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Crit Care Med 2022; 50:264–274
-
- Guérin C, Reignier J, Richard JC, et al.; PROSEVA Study Group: Prone positioning in severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 2013; 368:2159–2168
-
- Giani M, Rezoagli E, Guervilly C, et al.; EuroPronECMO Investigators: Prone positioning during venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for acute respiratory distress syndrome: A pooled individual patient data analysis. Crit Care 2022; 26:8
-
- Albert RK, Keniston A, Baboi L, et al.; Proseva Investigators: Prone position-induced improvement in gas exchange does not predict improved survival in the acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2014; 189:494–496
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources