Predicting drug-drug interactions with physiologically based pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modelling and optimal dosing of apixaban and rivaroxaban with dronedarone co-administration
- PMID: 35985100
- DOI: 10.1016/j.thromres.2022.08.007
Predicting drug-drug interactions with physiologically based pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modelling and optimal dosing of apixaban and rivaroxaban with dronedarone co-administration
Abstract
Background: The concurrent administration of dronedarone and oral anti-coagulants is common because both are used in managing atrial fibrillation (AF). Dronedarone is a moderate inhibitor of the cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) enzyme and P-glycoprotein (P-gp). Apixaban and rivaroxaban are P-gp and CYP3A4 substrates. This study aims to investigate the impact of exposure and bleeding risk of apixaban or rivaroxaban when co-administered with dronedarone using physiologically based pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis.
Methods: Modeling and simulation were conducted using Simcyp® Simulator. The parameters required for dronedarone modeling were collected from the literature. The developed dronedarone physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model was verified using reported drug-drug interactions (DDIs) between dronedarone and CYP3A4 and P-gp substrates. The model was applied to evaluate the DDI potential of dronedarone on the exposure of apixaban 5 mg every 12 h or rivaroxaban 20 mg every 24 h in geriatric and renally impaired populations. DDIs precipitating major bleeding risks were assessed using exposure-response analyses derived from literature.
Results: The model accurately described the pharmacokinetics of orally administered dronedarone in healthy subjects and accurately predicted DDIs between dronedarone and four CYP3A4 and P-gp substrates with fold errors <1.5. Dronedarone co-administration led to a 1.29 (90 % confidence interval (CI): 1.14-1.50) to 1.31 (90 % CI: 1.12-1.46)-fold increase in the area under concentration-time curve for rivaroxaban and 1.33 (90 % CI: 1.15-1.68) to 1.46 (90 % CI: 1.24-1.92)-fold increase for apixaban. The PD model indicated that dronedarone co-administration might potentiate the mean major bleeding risk of apixaban with a 1.45 to 1.95-fold increase. However, the mean major bleeding risk of rivaroxaban was increased by <1.5-fold in patients with normal or impaired renal function.
Conclusions: Dronedarone co-administration increased the exposure of rivaroxaban and apixaban and might potentiate major bleeding risks. Reduced apixaban and rivaroxaban dosing regimens are recommended when dronedarone is co-administered to patients with AF.
Keywords: Apixaban; Dronedarone; Drug-drug interaction; Major bleeding risk; Physiologically based pharmacokinetic; Rivaroxaban.
Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Zheng Jiao reports a relationship with Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd. that includes: consulting or advisory. Zheng Jiao reports a relationship with Sanofi China that includes: consulting or advisory.
Similar articles
-
Development and verification of a physiologically based pharmacokinetic model of dronedarone and its active metabolite N-desbutyldronedarone: Application to prospective simulation of complex drug-drug interaction with rivaroxaban.Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2023 Jun;89(6):1873-1890. doi: 10.1111/bcp.15670. Epub 2023 Feb 7. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2023. PMID: 36683488
-
Physiologically-Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling for the Prediction of a Drug-Drug Interaction of Combined Effects on P-glycoprotein and Cytochrome P450 3A.CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2020 Nov;9(11):659-669. doi: 10.1002/psp4.12562. Epub 2020 Nov 12. CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2020. PMID: 33030266 Free PMC article.
-
Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic drug interactions with new oral anticoagulants: what do they mean for patients with atrial fibrillation?Ann Pharmacother. 2013 Nov;47(11):1478-87. doi: 10.1177/1060028013504741. Epub 2013 Oct 9. Ann Pharmacother. 2013. PMID: 24259602 Review.
-
The real world use of combined P-glycoprotein and moderate CYP3A4 inhibitors with rivaroxaban or apixaban increases bleeding.J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2020 May;49(4):636-643. doi: 10.1007/s11239-020-02037-3. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2020. PMID: 31925665
-
Clinical significance of the rivaroxaban-dronedarone interaction: insights from physiologically based pharmacokinetic modelling.Eur Heart J Open. 2023 Jan 23;3(1):oead004. doi: 10.1093/ehjopen/oead004. eCollection 2023 Jan. Eur Heart J Open. 2023. PMID: 36820238 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Effectiveness and Safety of Different Oral Anticoagulants with P-glycoprotein/ CYP3A4 Inhibitors: A Network Meta-analysis.Curr Pharm Des. 2024;30(15):1167-1177. doi: 10.2174/0113816128293940240315073345. Curr Pharm Des. 2024. PMID: 38523519
-
Literature-based case analysis of serious adverse drug events associated with edoxaban.Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2025 Aug;81(8):1207-1216. doi: 10.1007/s00228-025-03863-1. Epub 2025 Jun 7. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2025. PMID: 40483337
-
In vivo evaluation of the pharmacokinetic interactions between almonertinib and rivaroxaban, almonertinib and apixaban.Front Pharmacol. 2023 Oct 4;14:1263975. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1263975. eCollection 2023. Front Pharmacol. 2023. PMID: 37860116 Free PMC article.
-
Advances in the structure, mechanism and targeting of chemoresistance-linked ABC transporters.Nat Rev Cancer. 2023 Nov;23(11):762-779. doi: 10.1038/s41568-023-00612-3. Epub 2023 Sep 15. Nat Rev Cancer. 2023. PMID: 37714963 Review.
-
A systematic review and meta-analysis of the morbidity of efficacy endpoints and bleeding events in elderly and young patients treated with the same dose rivaroxaban.Ann Hematol. 2024 Nov;103(11):4363-4373. doi: 10.1007/s00277-024-05767-z. Epub 2024 May 7. Ann Hematol. 2024. PMID: 38710878
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous