Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Oct;36(10):7077-7091.
doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09467-5. Epub 2022 Aug 19.

A SAGES technology and value assessment and pediatric committee evaluation of mini-laparoscopic instrumentation

Affiliations

A SAGES technology and value assessment and pediatric committee evaluation of mini-laparoscopic instrumentation

Thom E Lobe et al. Surg Endosc. 2022 Oct.

Abstract

Background: The TAVAC and Pediatric Committees of SAGES evaluated the current use of mini-laparoscopic instrumentation to better understand the role this category of devices plays in the delivery of minimally invasive surgery today.

Methods: The role of mini-laparoscopic instrumentation, defined as minimally invasive instruments of between 1 and 4 mm in diameter, was assessed by an exhaustive review of the peer reviewed literature on the subject between 1990 and 2021. The instruments, their use, and their perceived value were tabulated and described.

Results: Several reported studies propose a value to using mini-laparoscopic instrumentation over the use of larger instruments or as minimally invasive additions to commonly performed procedures. Additionally, specifically developed smaller-diameter instruments appear to be beneficial additions to our minimally invasive toolbox.

Conclusions: The development of small instrumentation for the effective performance of minimally invasive surgery, while perhaps best suited to pediatric populations, proves useful as adjuncts to a wide variety of adult surgical procedures. Mini-laparoscopic instrumentation thus proves valuable in selected cases.

Keywords: Laparoscopic instruments; Mini-laparoscopy; Needlescopic surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. SAGES manual of hernia (2013) Inguinal hernia repair with mini-laparoscopic instruments. Jacob, BP and Ramshaw, B (Eds) SAGES manual of hernia surgery. Springer, pp 461–481
    1. de Carvalho LF, Fierens K, Kint M (2013) Mini-laparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 23(2):109–116 - PubMed - DOI
    1. Bisgaard T, Klarskov B, Trap R, Kehlet H, Rosenberg J (2000) Pain after microlaparoscopic cholecystectomy. A randomized double-blind controlled study. Surg Endosc 14:340–344 - PubMed - DOI
    1. Schwenk W, Neudecker J, Mall J, Bohm B, Muller JM (2000) Prospective randomized blinded trial of pulmonary function, pain, and cosmetic results after laparoscopic vs microlaparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 14:345–348 - PubMed - DOI
    1. Cheah WK, Lenzi JE, So JBY, Kum CK, Goh PMY (2001) Randomized trial of needlescopic versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 88:45–47 - PubMed - DOI

LinkOut - more resources