Modelling vaccination capacity at mass vaccination hubs and general practice clinics: a simulation study
- PMID: 35986322
- PMCID: PMC9388987
- DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-08447-8
Modelling vaccination capacity at mass vaccination hubs and general practice clinics: a simulation study
Abstract
Background: COVID-19 mass vaccination programs place an additional burden on healthcare services. We aim to model the queueing process at vaccination sites to inform service delivery.
Methods: We use stochastic queue network models to simulate queue dynamics in larger mass vaccination hubs and smaller general practice (GP) clinics. We estimate waiting times and daily capacity based on a range of assumptions about appointment schedules, service times and staffing and stress-test these models to assess the impact of increased demand and staff shortages. We also provide an interactive applet, allowing users to explore vaccine administration under their own assumptions.
Results: Based on our assumed service times, the daily throughput for an eight-hour clinic at a mass vaccination hub ranged from 500 doses for a small hub to 1400 doses for a large hub. For GP clinics, the estimated daily throughput ranged from about 100 doses for a small practice to almost 300 doses for a large practice. What-if scenario analysis showed that sites with higher staff numbers were more robust to system pressures and mass vaccination sites were more robust than GP clinics.
Conclusions: With the requirement for ongoing COVID-19 booster shots, mass vaccination is likely to be a continuing feature of healthcare delivery. Different vaccine sites are useful for reaching different populations and maximising coverage. Stochastic queue networks offer a flexible and computationally efficient approach to simulate vaccination queues and estimate waiting times and daily throughput to inform service delivery.
Keywords: COVID-19; Health services research; Queues; Stochastic network models; Vaccination.
© 2022. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
CRM has consulted for or been on advisory boards on COVID-19 vaccines for Seqirus, Janssen and Astrazeneca. No other authors have a competing interest to declare.
Figures
References
-
- Thompson MG, Burgess JL, Naleway AL, et al. Interim estimates of vaccine effectiveness of BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 COVID-19 vaccines in preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection among health care personnel, first responders, and other essential and frontline workers—eight US locations, December 2020–march 2021. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021;70(13):495–500. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7013e3. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Bernal JL, Andrews N, Gower C, Robertson C, Stowe J, Tessier E, Simmons R, Cottrell S, Roberts R, O’Doherty M, Brown K. Effectiveness of the Pfizer-BioNTech and Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccines on COVID-19 related symptoms, hospital admissions, and mortality in older adults in England: test negative case-control study. BMJ. 2021;373:n1088. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n1088. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Sandmann FG, Davies NG, Vassall A, et al. The potential health and economic value of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination alongside physical distancing in the UK: a transmission model-based future scenario analysis and economic evaluation. Lancet Infect Dis. 2021;21(7):962–974. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00079-7. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
