Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Aug 20;22(1):377.
doi: 10.1186/s12872-022-02808-1.

Gene-diet interactions and cardiovascular diseases: a systematic review of observational and clinical trials

Affiliations

Gene-diet interactions and cardiovascular diseases: a systematic review of observational and clinical trials

Zayne M Roa-Díaz et al. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. .

Abstract

Background: Both genetic background and diet are important determinants of cardiovascular diseases (CVD). Understanding gene-diet interactions could help improve CVD prevention and prognosis. We aimed to summarise the evidence on gene-diet interactions and CVD outcomes systematically.

Methods: We searched MEDLINE® via Ovid, Embase, PubMed®, and The Cochrane Library for relevant studies published until June 6th 2022. We considered for inclusion cross-sectional, case-control, prospective cohort, nested case-control, and case-cohort studies as well as randomised controlled trials that evaluated the interaction between genetic variants and/or genetic risk scores and food or diet intake on the risk of related outcomes, including myocardial infarction, coronary heart disease (CHD), stroke and CVD as a composite outcome. The PROSPERO protocol registration code is CRD42019147031.

Results and discussion: We included 59 articles based on data from 29 studies; six articles involved multiple studies, and seven did not report details of their source population. The median sample size of the articles was 2562 participants. Of the 59 articles, 21 (35.6%) were qualified as high quality, while the rest were intermediate or poor. Eleven (18.6%) articles adjusted for multiple comparisons, four (7.0%) attempted to replicate the findings, 18 (30.5%) were based on Han-Chinese ethnicity, and 29 (49.2%) did not present Minor Allele Frequency. Fifty different dietary exposures and 52 different genetic factors were investigated, with alcohol intake and ADH1C variants being the most examined. Of 266 investigated diet-gene interaction tests, 50 (18.8%) were statistically significant, including CETP-TaqIB and ADH1C variants, which interacted with alcohol intake on CHD risk. However, interactions effects were significant only in some articles and did not agree on the direction of effects. Moreover, most of the studies that reported significant interactions lacked replication. Overall, the evidence on gene-diet interactions on CVD is limited, and lack correction for multiple testing, replication and sample size consideration.

Keywords: Cardiovascular diseases; Coronary heart disease; Diet; Gene-diet interaction; Myocardial infarction; Stroke.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow chart of study selection
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Findings for interaction between genetic variants and diet in relation to myocardial infarction. W = women, M = men, B = Both (Men and women)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Findings for interaction between genetic variants and diet in relation to coronary heart diseases. W = women, M = men, B = Both (Men and women)
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Findings for interaction between genetic variants and diet in relation to stroke. W = women, M = men, B = Both (Men and women)
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Findings for interaction between genetic variants and diet in relation to cardiovascular diseases as composite outcomes. W = women, M = men, B = Both (Men and women)

References

    1. Roth GA, Mensah GA, Fuster V. The global burden of cardiovascular diseases and risks: a compass for global action. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;76:2980–2981. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.11.021. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Afshin A, et al. Health effects of dietary risks in 195 countries, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global burden of disease study 2017. Lancet. 2019;393:1958–1972. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30041-8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wang DD, Hu FB. Dietary fat and risk of cardiovascular disease: recent controversies and advances. Annu Rev Nutr. 2017;37:423–446. doi: 10.1146/annurev-nutr-071816-064614. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schwingshackl L. Egg consumption and risk of chronic disease: an (un-) resolved issue? Am J Clin Nutr. 2020;111:735–736. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqaa035. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mazidi M, Katsiki N, Mikhailidis DP, Sattar N, Banach M. Lower carbohydrate diets and all-cause and cause-specific mortality: a population-based cohort study and pooling of prospective studies. Eur Heart J. 2019;40:2870–2879. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz174. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms