Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Oct:161:111257.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2022.111257. Epub 2022 Aug 7.

Clinical characteristics of vestibular evoked myogenic potentials in children with recurrent vertigo of childhood

Affiliations

Clinical characteristics of vestibular evoked myogenic potentials in children with recurrent vertigo of childhood

Dekun Gao et al. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2022 Oct.

Abstract

Objective: To explore the possible pathogenesis of recurrent vertigo of childhood (RVC) and the clinical diagnosis value of vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials (VEMPs).

Methods: The clinical data of 19 children (5.95 ± 0.38 years) diagnosed with RVC and 17 normal children (5.35 ± 0.31 years) enrolled in the control (NC) group from April 2017 to February 2021 was collected and analyzed. All subjects were tested for both cervical VEMP (cVEMP) and ocular VEMP (oVEMP). The elicit rate, thresholds, N1 latency, P1 latency, interval, amplitude, and amplitude asymmetry ratio (AAR) of VEMPs were compared and analyzed between the two groups.

Results: (1) The elicit rates of cVEMP and oVEMP have no significant difference between the two groups (P > 0.05). (2) The thresholds of cVEMP and oVEMP in the RVC group were higher than that in the NC group (P < 0.05). (3) The N1 latency of cVEMP in the RVC group was longer than that in the NC group (P < 0.05). The P1 latency of cVEMP and latencies of oVEMP have no significant difference between the two groups (P > 0.05). (4) The interval of cVEMP in the RVC group was longer than that in the NC group (P < 0.05), while the interval of oVEMP has no significant difference between the two groups (P > 0.05). (5) The amplitude of cVEMP in the RVC group was higher than that in the NC group (P < 0.05), while the amplitude of oVEMP was similar in the two groups (P > 0.05). (6) The AAR values of oVEMP and cVEMP were similar in the two groups (P > 0.05).

Conclusions: The elicit rates of VEMPs in children with RVC did not differ from that of normal children, but the thresholds were all increased, suggesting reduced sensitivity of the otolith organ and vestibular nerve conduction pathways. The P1 latency of cVEMP was normal in children with RVC, but N1 latency and interval of cVEMP were increased, we finally reached a conclusion that there might be potential impairment in the inferior vestibular nerve and the subsequent nerve conduction pathway in RVC.

Keywords: Benign paroxysmal vertigo of childhood; Otolith organ; Recurrent vertigo of childhood; Vestibular nerve conduction pathway; cVEMP; oVEMP.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of competing interest All authors listed have contributed sufficiently to the project to be included as authors, and all those who are qualified to be authors are listed in the author byline. To the best of our knowledge, none of the authors have potential conflicts of interest to be disclosed.

Similar articles

Cited by

LinkOut - more resources